Recent content by Arangar

Just tried this..and its great! Thanks :)

Gz on noticing this in the HOF list :) who would have thought this day would come !

Hi, The decay on MOD 2600 is 4.2 PEC..nothing else :-)

What I am saying is that I rather have one and the same cost for all slots. 1. Why invent a second type that needs to keep balanced? 2. Why make the true cost calculations for enhancers more difficult? Obviously I am not an expert on these things, I don't know the solution :) ..what I am...

So what your saying is that since 1-6 would cost less and 7-10 would cost more it would balance out and benefit more players? Sounds unnecessary complicated, I think there is a better solution..and if you look back in this thread you will see discussions about item caps, market manipulation etc.

If all enhancer slots work the same (break, boost ) etc..then they need to cost the same.

Not exactly precise no..you have to consider markup mats you get back on near success etc also. In either case I can assure you that at an end cost of 500% or 1000% for dmg vs acc enhancers it does not makes sense at all (for the avg setup that is) We have this wonderful enhanced weapon compare...

Thanks for the information ..

Nanocubes ie tt mats is not good at all... I am happy to pay markup for them but at a balanced cost vs benefit type of deal.

You may be right that it doesn't make sense for anyone. There are some arguments however that it would make sense for some "top tier" gear combos... all I know is that for the 2.950 dpp guy (who most of us are) it does not at this time.

bump for a system that makes sence for top tier gear/player only! :)

looking forward to this ! :-)

Expressed my feelings about this issue to support and got a reply that they will "forward to management". I expect nothing from it..however at this point in time it is not worth tiering my weapon. Another 1100ped cost for an empty socket on the weapon...dont think so.

But remember "if you play smart and stay eco"..you will have all that :-)

Agreed .....