Suggestion: None LA´s

ProActive Mango

Stalker
Joined
Aug 28, 2014
Posts
1,583
Why does the land areas have to show what tx they take and all the other places on caly and pp´s dont have to show what tax they have to pay to hunt and mine?

Should there be shown ingame what tax you pay in a area jsut as LA´s are forced to show.
 
In a non LA area tax is 0% (obviously MA has their rake based on looter/efficiency). LA tax in ON TOP of this
I think he just created a separate thread asking the same thing as Zho did with the transparency demand and not a "forgo LA tax debate" -- unless I am mistaken, in which case the OP was unclear.
 
Casinos don’t like to show you how much you are losing or you wouldn’t play.
 
Imagine MA plays reverse Uno card and disables showing tax on LAs 🤣
 
Don't Casinos, legal ones) HAVE to show your Expected ROI?
If they do they are good at hiding it. Ive never seen it. Maybe certain places have this law. Lottery competitions here are required to display the odds of winning however.
 
In a non LA area tax is 0% (obviously MA has their rake based on looter/efficiency). LA tax in ON TOP of this
If only we could get some proper tests done that could without a doubt prove that LA tax is on top of MA's rake. Or official MA confirmation.
If it is 100% then I would say MA should forfeit that rake to the LA owner. In order to motivate people to actually hunt in LA's. There's plenty enough of areas outside LA's that people hunt at so it wouldn't really affect them too much.
 
If only we could get some proper tests done that could without a doubt prove that LA tax is on top of MA's rake. Or official MA confirmation.
If it is 100% then I would say MA should forfeit that rake to the LA owner. In order to motivate people to actually hunt in LA's. There's plenty enough of areas outside LA's that people hunt at so it wouldn't really affect them too much.
They already confirmed it.
 
If only we could get some proper tests done that could without a doubt prove that LA tax is on top of MA's rake. Or official MA confirmation.
If it is 100% then I would say MA should forfeit that rake to the LA owner. In order to motivate people to actually hunt in LA's. There's plenty enough of areas outside LA's that people hunt at so it wouldn't really affect them too much.
 
Back
Top