David wrote 4 times the same answer, this is enough to understand that your items are safe, and guaranteed by MA if something goes wrong with the banks. Is it so hard to read between the lines, or am I totally wrong?
That the problem actually. Even after 6 times copy & pasting, he still hasn't anwsered
clearly if the person who takes a loan will have his item back or not.
I find it hillarious to see how hard for a guy from MindArk is to write a simple sentance such as "Yes, you will get your item back if you pay back your loan even if the maintanance fee expired when your loan was defaulted" or "No, you won't get your items back if you pay back your loan evenif the maintainance fee expired when your loan was defaulted".
What he does is the typical PR/non-liability blah blah, to say "I don't wanna be responsible for this". Which in other words means, they don't care about their customers once again. Can't believe its so hard to post an anwser without copy'n'pasting it 6 times. Can't he speak to bis supervisor/boss/whoever is in charge to get a clear anwser?
And after he copy'n'pasted the same paragraph for
incredible 6 times, we (the players/customers) are still as clever as before he ever did his first post.
Sorry to say, but i'm educated enough to not fall for this PR/deceive shit and can see if someone is trying to feed you with some nonsense without anwsering the originial question.
Edit:
Reading this, i think David misread/misunderstood the question (or did it on purpose to evade the real question).
I
don't mean when the bank is defaulted (due to player banned, inactive or cashing out all his money and vanishing from EU). I mean when the loan a player takes defaults (=when the player is not able to payback his loan, the
loan is defaulted, not
the bank).
The thing that is covered in this copy'n'paste paragraph only covers the case when the bank is defaulted for any reason (basicly that can't happen, since it's not a real bank but a pawn shop unless the bank runs of out of money and can't give any new loans)