i just looked up that korss H400 (L) has better eco even with markup so whats the point of having unlimited korss?
Lol, you really have been bad at maths or..?
(0.92*1.52)-1.139=1.3984-1.139=0.2594, meaning I get 28.19% less cost for its decay using the Unl one. The Unl Korss is also more eco then P5a(L) and P5a when amped.
The entropedia doesn't count markup in, true, but I wonder how did you count if you got that Unl had less eco. It does have more like all Unl weapons, maybe except the low game ones. Count where the auto does it for you to not make mistakes:
http://www.entropiatools.com/avgdmgpec.php
1) Enter
KorssH400(L) for 152% markup, 100 TT, about what you can get in auction on average (more TT will make people may more markup, the less the TT the more hidden decay also), with a105 on (what I have).
2.836 eco
2) Enter
KorssH400 with a105 and you get
2.9 eco, 0.064 eco more. I get
2.25% more damage for the same cost. Plus I do not pay for markup, meaning some part of decay goes for MA and some remains for my personal lootpool: like, swords have only decay but we still get loot, right? Well with markup you can't have a chance to get a % of that back from the system.
3) Enter
Mod Isis LR32 with a105 (best one can have) and you get
2.965 eco, 0.065 eco more which means
2.24% more than with my korss and twice the difference if we compare it with KorssH400(L). The latter gun costs twice as korss and has almost twice the effect. I think it's all fair here.
Basically I should get more than 2% of TT back than by using a (L) gun.