Mika
Elite
- Joined
- Apr 22, 2009
- Posts
- 4,098
- Location
- Haweewee
irl if you had a huge buisness and they where making an highway near it or a road the public state would have to agree on it first wether to build it or not. if not approved the ones who wanted it would continoue their case till they get allowance. if the part wich has the buisness closeby loose their screwed and will pretty much just have to try squeesing some sort of an "make good thing" out of it, IE since they build the road they can sort of demand them also making sound damping walls around it and improve the insolation of the buildening to dampen the noise.
if the land was owned by the buisness and the makes of the highway wanted to build in it they would have to pay up and again agree with the state, if the buisness owner refused everything and the road was vital it would go to the state people to decide and if the buisness owner lost he'd be fucked, if not the roadbuilders would be fucked and would have to find another solution to their road
this recently happened when they where expanding the highway 20 meters from my house, they had to tear down 1 house, and they had to pay every home that is close fees for noise damping walls, windows and isolation for the older ones we got a glas house thingy to be in outside that is noise damping and new windows on the whole side towards the highway, for free. they havent finished the highway yet, still till january till that, but we have already gotten the windows, doors, outhouse etcetc without paying for it nor the craftsemn installing it into our home
in irl there will always be communication between the two parts and in 99% of the cases compensations will be made. this is why you can't compare IRL like this to MA since, well i got no idea about LA's works like this but MA just does thing as if they where the "state" plowing around without any communication nor compensation.
it's just logical that the LA's that have been drasticly "ruined" like many i assume should recieve compensations. but for that to happen the ones owning a LA would have to examine their LA, found out what its like now compared to before, bad, good, what is bad and good incase, what could be done to compensate/changed etc.
if the land was owned by the buisness and the makes of the highway wanted to build in it they would have to pay up and again agree with the state, if the buisness owner refused everything and the road was vital it would go to the state people to decide and if the buisness owner lost he'd be fucked, if not the roadbuilders would be fucked and would have to find another solution to their road
this recently happened when they where expanding the highway 20 meters from my house, they had to tear down 1 house, and they had to pay every home that is close fees for noise damping walls, windows and isolation for the older ones we got a glas house thingy to be in outside that is noise damping and new windows on the whole side towards the highway, for free. they havent finished the highway yet, still till january till that, but we have already gotten the windows, doors, outhouse etcetc without paying for it nor the craftsemn installing it into our home
in irl there will always be communication between the two parts and in 99% of the cases compensations will be made. this is why you can't compare IRL like this to MA since, well i got no idea about LA's works like this but MA just does thing as if they where the "state" plowing around without any communication nor compensation.
it's just logical that the LA's that have been drasticly "ruined" like many i assume should recieve compensations. but for that to happen the ones owning a LA would have to examine their LA, found out what its like now compared to before, bad, good, what is bad and good incase, what could be done to compensate/changed etc.