Divinity
Marauder
- Joined
- Jun 1, 2010
- Posts
- 5,157
- Location
- India
- Society
- Freelancer
- Avatar Name
- Divinity Deth Undefined
UPDATE == MINING FIESTA : REGISTRATION OPENED TODAY
https://www.planetcalypsoforum.com/...vanced-Tiers-3000-peds-in-prizes-45-Day-Event
Dear Entropians,
In my previous poll, i have received a lot of feedback from the wonderful community we have here. So here is what i have planned for the month of October/November depending on when we can have some consensus.
1. Point System :
I presume all know about the Find Size expressed as I, II, .. X, XI.. etc.
Now what we do is set the base as X. So if u get a XI you get 1 point. A XII gets you two points and so on.
The winner at the end of the month is the person with the highest number of points. The first and second runners up are decided in points as well.
Optional : 2 or 3 categories of miners divided by skill level. Participant will be checked for skills before and after event.
2. Solis Tower : Solis, has been found within OLA42 and has been confirmed by many miners. The objective here is to get a solis tower and if there are more one found then the highest tower wins. Simple.
Update 1 : 28.09.2010 - More Options
--------------------------
1. Personally , i dont think that finder decides the claim size. It changes the depth and the MU found but not the size IMO. The thing that changes that is amps. So, what i propose is based on amp usage rather then the finder. Basically we can have 2 groups 0-14 and 15 above. Till 14 you cannot use the higher amps which is why i feel that is a fair level to make a classification.
2. We do not want to be counting too many claims and that is the reason i proposed X in my OP. Note , it becomes very tough for you to keep screenshot'ing while you mine. However what i suggest this for the Level I Miners it be V and level II miners we keep it as X
3. The classification of ores/enmatter.Based on my experience I would say adding 1 Lvl to enmatter claim size should even out the possibilities. Basically all IV's become V.. and V becomes equal to VI in ores. If someone with more experience can suggest any issue with this , please do so.
Feel free to discuss any changes to the present schematics you would like and any other aspect of the event that you would want me to consider.
TP should not be a concern for most miners , especially if the prize pool is significant ( you can always discuss the significant bit ) and as far as Naming is concerned, the size does not take that into account anyways.
I am also considering a participation fee to make the event reward larger then otherwise. How many would object to that?? That also will confirm how many actually want to participate. So please mention if you would participate if the event fee was like 5 ped for registration.
Attached you will find a poll. I would appreciate your responses.
Looking forward to the thoughts ,
Divinity
https://www.planetcalypsoforum.com/...vanced-Tiers-3000-peds-in-prizes-45-Day-Event
Dear Entropians,
In my previous poll, i have received a lot of feedback from the wonderful community we have here. So here is what i have planned for the month of October/November depending on when we can have some consensus.
1. Point System :
I presume all know about the Find Size expressed as I, II, .. X, XI.. etc.
Now what we do is set the base as X. So if u get a XI you get 1 point. A XII gets you two points and so on.
The winner at the end of the month is the person with the highest number of points. The first and second runners up are decided in points as well.
Optional : 2 or 3 categories of miners divided by skill level. Participant will be checked for skills before and after event.
2. Solis Tower : Solis, has been found within OLA42 and has been confirmed by many miners. The objective here is to get a solis tower and if there are more one found then the highest tower wins. Simple.
Update 1 : 28.09.2010 - More Options
--------------------------
1. Personally , i dont think that finder decides the claim size. It changes the depth and the MU found but not the size IMO. The thing that changes that is amps. So, what i propose is based on amp usage rather then the finder. Basically we can have 2 groups 0-14 and 15 above. Till 14 you cannot use the higher amps which is why i feel that is a fair level to make a classification.
2. We do not want to be counting too many claims and that is the reason i proposed X in my OP. Note , it becomes very tough for you to keep screenshot'ing while you mine. However what i suggest this for the Level I Miners it be V and level II miners we keep it as X
3. The classification of ores/enmatter.Based on my experience I would say adding 1 Lvl to enmatter claim size should even out the possibilities. Basically all IV's become V.. and V becomes equal to VI in ores. If someone with more experience can suggest any issue with this , please do so.
Feel free to discuss any changes to the present schematics you would like and any other aspect of the event that you would want me to consider.
TP should not be a concern for most miners , especially if the prize pool is significant ( you can always discuss the significant bit ) and as far as Naming is concerned, the size does not take that into account anyways.
I am also considering a participation fee to make the event reward larger then otherwise. How many would object to that?? That also will confirm how many actually want to participate. So please mention if you would participate if the event fee was like 5 ped for registration.
Attached you will find a poll. I would appreciate your responses.
Looking forward to the thoughts ,
Divinity
Last edited: