Menu
What's New
By:
Filters

Stackables with no market history

R

remontoire

Marauder
Joined
Feb 10, 2010
Posts
6,495
Society
Bravo Three-Nil
Avatar Name
John itwasntme Remontoire
presently default to 0%, and so show up as not costing anything in marked-up blueprint costs. Shouldn't these default to 100% instead?
 
No, because 100% means that it sold for 100% of the TT value. 0% means it didnt sel at all. There's actually mats that recently sold for 99% according to history.
 
e-lite said:
No, because 100% means that it sold for 100% of the TT value. 0% means it didnt sel at all. There's actually mats that recently sold for 99% according to history.
Click to expand...

And that gives no additional information at all for the question at hand (marked up blueprint clicks) and is also misleading.
 
remontoire said:
And that gives no additional information at all for the question at hand (marked up blueprint clicks) and is also misleading.
Click to expand...
Sorry man, I must have missunderstood your question completley. My bad.
 
e-lite said:
No, because 100% means that it sold for 100% of the TT value. 0% means it didnt sel at all. There's actually mats that recently sold for 99% according to history.
Click to expand...

e-lite said:
Sorry man, I must have missunderstood your question completley. My bad.
Click to expand...

Hm I guess you are thinking about the ingame auction data, having missed that this is in the Entropedia subforum... I do that rather often myself :) heh

Yeah, for Entropedia it should probably be listed at 100% for the blueprint ingredient list if there is no known data.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top