i keep reading other people's and figured id try doing one of my own. ive been loosely keeping track in a spreadsheet of mining runs ive done but it was completely unorganized and i didnt count mu which ive found to be a really important factor. in all of my current ones i calculate the markup to be on the low-end so the numbers for returns are slightly below what they actually are.
i only keep track of half markup, ie. if something has 117% mu i record is as 108.5% etc. this causes some of my numbers for gains from MU to seem abnormally low compared to the tt value.
~runs ive kept track of starting 6/17/2012~
~run 1~
probes: 156.15
repair/decay: 59.59
total cost: 215.03
gains: 311.18
notable finds: XII belkar, XV gazz
this run: (+)95.44
overall: (+)95.44
~run 2~
probes: 198
repair/decay: 5.03
total cost: 203.03
TT gains: 161.11
MU: 19.04
notable finds: IX gazz
this run: (-)22.88
overall: (+) 72.56
at this point i started doing a standard number of probes, the decay tends to vary cause sometimes i use a tp chip to get around so i include decay and ME usage.
~run 3~
probes: 150
repair/decay: 10.15
total cost: 160.15
tt gains: 334.71
MU: 41.06
notable finds: ix cave sap, xii belkar, xv gazz
this run: (+)215.62
overall: (+) 288.18
~run 4~
probes: 150
repair/decay: 6.81
total cost: 156.81
tt gains: 255.41
MU: 20.41
notable finds: 23ped beacon, ix gazz, ix cave sap, xiv gazz
this run: (+) 119.01
overall: (+) 407.19
~run 5~
probes: 150
repair/decay: 10.56
total cost: 160.56
tt gains: 135.29
MU: 16.7
notable finds: xi gazz
this run: (-) 8.57
overall: (+) 398.62
~run6~
probes:150
repair/decay: 13.08
total cost: 163.08
tt gains: 116.68
MU: 10.94
notable finds: ix blau, ix gazz
this run: (-) 35.46
overall: (+)363.16
~run7~
probes: 150
repair/decay: 6.24
total cost: 156.24
tt gain: 153.25
MU: 14.8
notable finds: ix garcen, xii gazz
this run: (+) 11.81
overall: (+) 374.97
~run 8~experimented with an amp~
probes: 150
decay/repair: 56.04
total cost: 206.04
tt gain: 251.09
MU: 23.45
notable finds: xi gazz, xiv gazz
both of those were after the amp died
this run: (+) 68.5
overall: (+) 443.47
i only keep track of half markup, ie. if something has 117% mu i record is as 108.5% etc. this causes some of my numbers for gains from MU to seem abnormally low compared to the tt value.
~runs ive kept track of starting 6/17/2012~
~run 1~
probes: 156.15
repair/decay: 59.59
total cost: 215.03
gains: 311.18
notable finds: XII belkar, XV gazz
this run: (+)95.44
overall: (+)95.44
~run 2~
probes: 198
repair/decay: 5.03
total cost: 203.03
TT gains: 161.11
MU: 19.04
notable finds: IX gazz
this run: (-)22.88
overall: (+) 72.56
at this point i started doing a standard number of probes, the decay tends to vary cause sometimes i use a tp chip to get around so i include decay and ME usage.
~run 3~
probes: 150
repair/decay: 10.15
total cost: 160.15
tt gains: 334.71
MU: 41.06
notable finds: ix cave sap, xii belkar, xv gazz
this run: (+)215.62
overall: (+) 288.18
~run 4~
probes: 150
repair/decay: 6.81
total cost: 156.81
tt gains: 255.41
MU: 20.41
notable finds: 23ped beacon, ix gazz, ix cave sap, xiv gazz
this run: (+) 119.01
overall: (+) 407.19
~run 5~
probes: 150
repair/decay: 10.56
total cost: 160.56
tt gains: 135.29
MU: 16.7
notable finds: xi gazz
this run: (-) 8.57
overall: (+) 398.62
~run6~
probes:150
repair/decay: 13.08
total cost: 163.08
tt gains: 116.68
MU: 10.94
notable finds: ix blau, ix gazz
this run: (-) 35.46
overall: (+)363.16
~run7~
probes: 150
repair/decay: 6.24
total cost: 156.24
tt gain: 153.25
MU: 14.8
notable finds: ix garcen, xii gazz
this run: (+) 11.81
overall: (+) 374.97
~run 8~experimented with an amp~
probes: 150
decay/repair: 56.04
total cost: 206.04
tt gain: 251.09
MU: 23.45
notable finds: xi gazz, xiv gazz
both of those were after the amp died
this run: (+) 68.5
overall: (+) 443.47
Last edited: