Chuck Wholrey
Dominant
- Joined
- Feb 21, 2012
- Posts
- 399
- Location
- Missouri, USA
- Society
- Benevolence
- Avatar Name
- Chuck Jarrdhead Wholrey
GRUDGE MATCH
Pulsar 8 VS Mark.5b
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Pulsar 8 (L) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Mark.5b UL
TT Value . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 45 ped . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31.10 ped
MU % and ped value . . . . . 108.89% <49 ped> = 4 ped MU . . . TT+35.63 ped <day> = 66.73 ped
Protection . . . . . . . 11 IMP, 19 CUT, 6 STAB =36 overall . . . . . 12 IMP, 9 CUT, 8 STAB = 29 overall
Durability . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .<14000> . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . <900>
Decay Value* . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . <.03639 ped> . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . <.03513 ped>
*The decay test was done with Settler Armor on Calypso, at the oil rig VS Atrox Prowler. Both were hits in the Thigh Guard, for the same value .01138 ped decay on the armor, plus the decay listed for the Armor Plate.
Draw your own conclusions... With the difference in Durability, and the drop in protection as UL plates decay... I would say Pulsar 8 wins.
** I lost the fight with the forum spacing allowance, sorry for all of the dots
*** I should also point out This info was also posted on Arkadiaforum.com :
http://arkadiaforum.com/showthread.php?9694-Pulsar-8-(L)-Armor-Plate-VS-Mark-5b-UL-Armor-Plate
Last edited: