FauconIoji
Provider
- Joined
- Nov 20, 2010
- Posts
- 158
- Location
- Hang out: Icarus. Apartment: Medusa South Tower, F
- Avatar Name
- Faucon Ioji VanAlkel
i wish people woudl understand what they read before professing great insight, but hey, we can have everything. as billairboy has shown, sales roses only 2.3 million SEK and theres nothing in the "other income" income to account for an increase as there is clearly a ~11 m SEK drop. so the claim "You can see, in plain, straight numbers, that there is improvement of over 10 million dollars in revenue" is manifestly wrong. your subsequent follow up shows a stunning ability to cherry pick numbers to arrive a false conclusion.
looking properly through the numbers its clear that the improvment (reduction) in losses is from changes to expenses, but those expenses arent properly explained so its unclear if they where exceptional or the reduction is. (i believe they where exceptional cost in 2012, dont recall what though).
to claim that Calypso isnt Mindark's primary source of income is quite incredible when there is nothing in the numbers, notes or report to suggest where this revenue source is, i think we would have noticed. if there is another source of income buried in the net sales line, then Entropia platform is in an even worse shape, which is contrary to what you believe. MA isnt ever going to turn a profit from amortisation of the platform.
oh, and the graphs on Entropia Planets do not show what you think they show: the rising trend is % return against the average price the corresponding week. this would be mostly due to lowering CLD values, not increased weekly revenue, which is clearly trending downward.
The number was 17m. I'll go back and correct it.
And they profited 17 m sek more in 2013 than 2012, so I don't understand what you're saying.
As for Calypso's ability to produce income, why would they have tried to sell it if it was that important?
Last edited: