Menu
What's New
By:
Filters

Isis LC-35 (L) or Isis LC-35 E.L.M Edition (L)

Marijuana

Marijuana

Old Alpha
Joined
Dec 19, 2005
Posts
777
Location
Holland
Society
The Dung Kickers
Avatar Name
Mari Juana DutchGirl
Hello evryone !

I would liek to know wich isis lc-35 is more eco

Isis LC-35 E.L.M Edition (L) is 1 ped TT and aprox 70 ped TT+
Ammo burn is a bit more than the normal one

Isis LC-35 (L) is 155 ped tt and aprox 115 %
 
regularvselm.jpg


ELM @ 7000%
normal @ 115%
Using A106 just for benchmark purposes
 
Isis LC-35 with 155ped tt has a total uses of 7819 shots.
Isis LC-35 ELM Edition has a total uses of 7462 shots.

With LC-35 close to 160ped and the ELM at around 70ped, you might as well get 2 Elms instead of a single LC-35, 15k~ shots vs. 7500~ shots.
 
S4400Salvation said:
Isis LC-35 with 155ped tt has a total uses of 7819 shots.
Isis LC-35 ELM Edition has a total uses of 7462 shots.

With LC-35 close to 160ped and the ELM at around 70ped, you might as well get 2 Elms instead of a single LC-35, 15k~ shots vs. 7500~ shots.
Click to expand...

Yea so thats what i was thinking so the ELM is realy eco or am i missing sumthing ?
 
Fanan said:
You are missing Manique's post. It's all about the dmg/pec ...
Click to expand...

I see that post but still the isis ELM is more eco
 
Since you question about that, i reckon you mention efficiency
For the MU you mentioned, the regular one has got better efficiency than the ELM one,
Difference on these, regular has higher decay, ELM has higher ammo consumptions,

For the average user with a thighter budget, the ELM are great, they last long and not a huge ped investment
70 ped hurts less than near 200 for full gun at times. even if uneco, not everyone plays 100% eco
 
Marijuana said:
I see that post but still the isis ELM is more eco
Click to expand...

I thought the ELM one is less eco as you want the damage per pec to be higher.
So you're doing less damage for each pec you spend according to the table.
 
addz said:
I thought the ELM one is less eco as you want the damage per pec to be higher.
So you're doing less damage for each pec you spend according to the table.
Click to expand...

Yes but the elm is 70 ped and last just as long as the normal one ?
 
From what i read
ELM does last longer but less efficient
So its cheaper the purchase, but less eco
 
Manique said:
From what i read
ELM does last longer but less efficient
So its cheaper the purchase, but less eco
Click to expand...

So if the elm last longer and it is way cheaper to buy than the normal one than it is more eco or am i wrong ?
 
Marijuana said:
So if the elm last longer and it is way cheaper to buy than the normal one than it is more eco or am i wrong ?
Click to expand...

you are wrong
eco is damage / pec

just because the purchase is cheaper, doesnt mean it is ecoer
For that regard in your eyes a weapon of 400 ped tt bought at tt is less eco than ELM at 70 ped, when isnt.
Markup VS weapon's decay will set their efficiency
Is why the Arkadian weapons even with high markup compared to caly are still a good bet to use since they've still got high efficiency.
 
Manique said:
you are wrong
eco is damage / pec

just because the purchase is cheaper, doesnt mean it is ecoer
For that regard in your eyes a weapon of 400 ped tt bought at tt is less eco than ELM at 70 ped, when isnt.
Markup VS weapon's decay will set their efficiency
Is why the Arkadian weapons even with high markup compared to caly are still a good bet to use since they've still got high efficiency.
Click to expand...


You think you are right about eco but your not ;)
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top