Call me bitter but i've got 2 soc mates spent months grinding these BP, they've been in EU for years and this player who looks like his Ava is 2 months old scores the ATH......
GZ dude but seriously MA have a word with yourselfs! When was the last hunting ATH outwith an Event? or how about a crafting or mining ATH for joe Blogs who is not gambling away his house and car?
Call me bitter but i've got 2 soc mates spent months grinding these BP, they've been in EU for years and this player who looks like his Ava is 2 months old scores the ATH......
Can you tell me what is the difference between noob getting ATH and some old player?
Every single click is a chance (same for everyone) so if Old players spend 95% of the money and noobs only 5% then it is quite logical that one out of 20ATHs is received by new avatar.
Loot size depends on the input, so if you want to ATH, be ready to pay most per click, but usually gamblers are willing to pay more than sweat gathering old timers.
Yawn just forget it
Can you tell me what is the difference between noob getting ATH and some old player?
The difference is that there is, and has been for years, a clear bias towards newer players, or players returning after a long break, getting big loots. Obviously it doesn't happen all the time, and obviously it's not only those players getting the big loots, but it happens way more often than it would in a system where everyone has an equal chance.
I can understand why MA would think this is a good idea - though I also believe they are mistaken, as what this really does is reward inactivity - but what really angers me is that they've denied it in the past.
Grats to the guy on his loot though, fair play to him, it's not his fault that the system is skewed.
You guys keep calling it a 'gamble', but as far as we know from the video, this only took him 2 clicks! That's insane. Grats H4hhWolfe!!!!!
The difference is that there is, and has been for years, a clear bias towards newer players, or players returning after a long break, getting big loots. Obviously it doesn't happen all the time, and obviously it's not only those players getting the big loots, but it happens way more often than it would in a system where everyone has an equal chance.
I can understand why MA would think this is a good idea - though I also believe they are mistaken, as what this really does is reward inactivity - but what really angers me is that they've denied it in the past.
Grats to the guy on his loot though, fair play to him, it's not his fault that the system is skewed.
I would love to know the stats on that.
Graphs are great for showing trends, but I don't have the info!
Rgds
Ace
I would love to know the stats on that.
Graphs are great for showing trends, but I don't have the info!
Rgds
Ace