CLD/AUD/Compet - paid in UA

AUD/CLD/COMPET should pe paid in UA?


  • Total voters
    61
  • Poll closed .
Status

maiden

Alpha
Joined
May 28, 2015
Posts
678
Location
Drama
Society
@Rig
Avatar Name
Zarta Maiden Selios
I wish that all the revenue from AUD/COMPET/CLD should be made in Universal Ammo. That way we ensure a minim cycle of the ped. Do not forget is an RCE and we need an economy which is down already. We need more loot, more wagering, more action. Leeches with lots of deeds just suck the ped.... Who think make that ped possible? the rest of the players... Make them cycle too, at least just once.
This is my wish.
Who is with me ? :yup::yup::yup::yup:
:smoke:
 
This is by far one of the worst ideas I have heard. And I've heard a lot of bad ideas.

which is down already
Don't make statements like this unless you are going to provide sources to back them up, please.
 
This is by far one of the worst ideas I have heard. And I've heard a lot of bad ideas.


Don't make statements like this unless you are going to provide sources to back them up, please.

I am happy u loot only MU , I don't ! I want MU on loot not 1-5%
 
I think it could be a cool option. Maybe give 10% more UA if you choose your payout amount in UA instead of ped. However I should make it clear that the current pay out method should stay. I wouldn't mind another pay out option as an addition not replacement
 
Would you rather have 20$ cash or 20$ itunes giftcard?
 
Heh... no.

Melee player here. How many melee players will flood the market with their deeds because their deeds would technically became worthless to them if this would be in play.

Just no.

Even if you could choose between PED an UA, I think still a lot of people would stick with the PED.
 
Some people will have to shoot 24/7 :laugh:
And when u r at it why not 90% of the loot in UA :laugh:
 
NO - damn UA all around ... only PED is true money.
 
I like the idea behind it, but to do that now would blow away all trust in the game.
It would render most CLD useless for a lot of people who paid good money to get those deeds.

So, no, dont do it!

Maybe it could be done with new sort of deeds in the future.
 
Please don't reply to this thread, because someone at Mindark might see it...

Oh damn..
 
What's with all the very bad ideas? Why are we trying to solve a problem that isn't an issue?

Why do you feel you need to go after investors when they are the ones depositing large sums which allows for you to withdraw?

You want markup not 1 to 5%, well your suggestion doesn't get you there.

0/10
 
What's with all the very bad ideas? Why are we trying to solve a problem that isn't an issue?

Why do you feel you need to go after investors when they are the ones depositing large sums which allows for you to withdraw?

You want markup not 1 to 5%, well your suggestion doesn't get you there.

0/10

They not invested into the game economy. The put money in, bought deeds and now, for already too damn many years just leech the ped out of the game. MINDARK WAKE UP! BUY-BACK ALL THE DEEDS FOR 1k PED !
 
They not invested into the game economy. The put money in, bought deeds and now, for already too damn many years just leech the ped out of the game. MINDARK WAKE UP! BUY-BACK ALL THE DEEDS FOR 1k PED !

CLD owners are the reason the game still exists. MA needed a cash infusion so they sold CLDs. ARK needed a cash infusion so they sold AUDs.

Compet Deeds haven't paid out a red cent to anyone.
 
They not invested into the game economy. The put money in, bought deeds and now, for already too damn many years just leech the ped out of the game.

If not for the money they got for the deeds, there wouldn't be any game or economy today.

Do not forget is an RCE
MINDARK WAKE UP! BUY-BACK ALL THE DEEDS FOR 1k PED !
There is a bit of contradiction, don't you think? Would you like to sell your gear for a third of the price? That would be good for the economy.

Anyway, even at 1k ped it's a $6 mil usd which they don't have.
 
If not for the money they got for the deeds, there wouldn't be any game or economy today.



There is a bit of contradiction, don't you think? Would you like to sell your gear for a third of the price? That would be good for the economy.

Anyway, even at 1k ped it's a $6 mil usd which they don't have.

CLD were 1k.... and if MA want them back they pay 1k min :) or 0.00 if no game :) Simple ... They will never ever pay 2k per cld....
What can I say.... MA could loan from a bank and save it... not loan from players and still paying... CLD were supposed to have ROI 4 years... now they paid double and still paying...
OK... let them pay in UA so deed owners play the game too, not just suck the money.
I hated the CLD AUD idea since they made it.... and I never bought any.... *I invested a lot of k's$ so far... I coulded just be another leech that buy cld's and then wait on pornhub.... but I choosed to play the game :)
(got my frustration?) Is already enough.... I didn't complained after 4 years... now they are 8 ffs
 
Want a stronger economy?

Find uses for all of the pointless mats and resources in mining/hunting.

See Also: Crafting Overhaul.
 
Want a stronger economy?

Find uses for all of the pointless mats and resources in mining/hunting.

See Also: Crafting Overhaul.

There are uses.... but all crafters play stupid EP IV :)
 
...
I hated the CLD AUD idea since they made it.... and I never bought any....



ahh, so it all boils down to this.
You're frustrated you didnt buy any for 1k and instead of blaming yourself for not doing so, you want to take it away from the people who dare-invested when they just came out.

Remember, all the people who take out PED from CLD have put the PED in first. That's called INVESTING!
Killing the invest equals killing the trust in the game resulting in a dead game.

is that what you want?
 
CLD were supposed to have ROI 4 years... now they paid double and still paying...

What does it mean? You assume the deeds were meant to be removed after reaching 100% ROI? You again contradict the idea of RCE. The deeds are here to stay for as long as the game exists (either way, because if MA tries to do something to them, the game would cease to exist right away).
 
no thx, MA destroyed to much trust aleady and this idea would be just another nail in the coffin
 
As long there is no use for UA to melee hunters or crafters, I am against this idea.

If there would be really good option to use UA even for melee or crafters, then I would say yes why not, but that is not the case, so definately NO.

What should a 100% crafter who invested in lets say 100 CLDs to do constant crafting (buying resource with the revenue PED) do with UA ???
 
I like the idea, however i dont like that uni-ammo would be the only option.
Maybe give the option for ped or uni-ammo+3% this gives ppl the option if they want the ped for withdrawl or a nice bonus incentive to help pay for hunting/mining crap mobs or crap mining areas.

Id also like to see MA add an option to trade uni-ammo for nano cubes 1/1 ratio and for the melee issue i had an idea that maybe if its even posible for MA to code in is to instead of the melee decaying it first looks for uni-ammo and takes from the pile the ammount the decay would have been. Ofc this wouldnt work for L weapons. I think it can be done if MA put a hot coal on their coders seats.
 
Payment option in rock bucks may be interesting
 
Ok, shrapnel ... still better then pure PEDs.
The ideea was that the return should somehow be wagered at least once .... That's all. Will for sure be a bust of the economy. Last year ROI was almost 9 milion peds. 1 wager of that and is already a boost.....


PS: I coulded buy them for +980 or even less in the 1st month but I didn't liked the ideea... For a LA at least u use dung and u need to be active, make events etc.... But this was just a mistake to let em for this long. They shoulded put an expiration or buy-back stamp....
 
This is not gonna work what about the big holder with more than 10k deeds ? I dont think they would like the idea and they certainly not here to play all day EU.
 
I think it could be a cool option. Maybe give 10% more UA if you choose your payout amount in UA instead of ped. However I should make it clear that the current pay out method should stay. I wouldn't mind another pay out option as an addition not replacement

I agree, I think as an option and not mandatory it would be nice.
 
Status
Back
Top