Well, it would be interesting to see the results of a virtual time machine, with lots of players from "the future" able to play in "the past".
Would you play on a clean slate EU and restart an avatar the same as everyone else?
However, you cannot make players "unknowledgable", so it would all turn out differently anyway, especially the mus, desired items etc. Also, what vu should MA chose anyway, and with or without bug fixes? Should they update that world, or keep it locked without further additions?
Another LOL thought - is what we have now the best EU ever?
AND, are there agreements with PPs in place that the platform should not water down the playerbase any further? Reintroducing a new Old Caly would split the existing base quite a bit I suspect, even if some new players were attracted. PPs would not like that - nor would CLD and other deed holders if the 'time travel EU' didn't share the turnover with them.
Nope, the past should not be revisited if it is "alive" as an RCE, nor should EU compete with previous versions of itself...
I agree with what you say. Not sure I would want to start over though as I am about where I have wanted to be from the start.
I do have to say this Ver. is about the best, for being a hunter 99% of the time, IMO. From my stand point I don't I would change anything right now.