Search results

"Playing around"? Do you mean playing near them? as in having them on your radar? If so, then just make instances containing the mobs and the players will probably go there and leave you alone. I leave it to everyone else how they handle their own health. The only thing I will not do is demand...

Woah woah woah, slow down there. How did you go from "enjoying these activities" to "compete with a bot" in literally the next sentence? What are you actually enjoying? What will kill the game is lack of ped cycle and deposits. If everyone played like Super Spesh, the game would die. Mindark...

Thankfully, MyWife.exe doesn't judge and will happily help you too become uber over time by doing the more menial repetitive actions for you. You might even be thankful for the help as you get older. Benefits from MyWife.exe include things such as no carpal tunnel syndrome from excessive button...

1. Its fine as it is in my opinion. 2. Mining is like hunting but in reverse. Hunting -> pew pew pew for some time then see results Mining -> see results then drill drill drill Fine as it is. If you go ahead and remove the drill drill drill part, would you also want to remove the pew pew pew...

Understandable. What is missing from the picture of higher tt returns for higher skilled players is the fact that those extra % must come from somewhere. Do you think that mindark is going to reduce their cut to give to the high skilled players? I find it unlikely, but there is only one other...

Also, lets not ignore the incredible shortsightedness of the idea of providing higher tt returns for higher skilled players.

I think we can replace the wave system with a mission system. With a mission system, game knowledge can be applied to complete objectives in an efficient manner and you can be sure you get what you are after once you have put in the work. With a mission system, if you arent picking up the...

I dont understand why waves are a must. Could you elaborate why? Im curious also in what way you agree on making mining skills matter a lot more.

Here are some suggestions that I think are useful. 1. Make the damage over time from arso chips stand out in the log. Currently: [System]: You inflicted 50.0 points of damage Possible solution 1 [System]: You inflicted 50.0 points of damage over time Possible solution 2 [System]: You inflicted...

I dont care about the version number. Its what is underlying that matters. Ill go cool down somewhere. Take care.

What is this bullshit? Tell the team to increment tomorrows release to 18.4.3 or something.

This, exactly. Either need to nerf the current UL market or introduce superior (L) gear, yes that includes better than mod-nano. Fully UL playerbase destroys the economy because it only produces loot and doesn't consume it.

Yea. I would love to say good things about their work, but Mindark isn't exactly making it easy to do so.

.. so far .. that you know of.

One of the TWEN weapons fit your criteria of high eff and low dpp. Its a sword.

Pretty cool actually. When a (L) weapon lasts as long as this does, there is kind of no use for UL. If future weapons, something like Omegaton C-150 (L) to Omegaton C-200 (L), were to be introduced instead of a few UL only for handful of players, it would make it more accessible to everyone and...

Lets get real here. They havent even got the event working for everybody yet. Manual adjustements to the open world so that all can play is pretty far reaching.

The open world is a failure during events when more than a handful of players want to participate. Thanks for pointing out that people play singleplayer in a multiplayer game. If anything, this is a argument for having instances.

There are plenty of examples in the game where one player can completely dominate a creature to the point where no other player can hunt it. My point still stands. The design of the open world hunting is excellent for a single player game but it fails hard in a multiplayer game.

But, isnt that already the case? Isnt that why Alina was bringing it up? I dont see a way for the game to grow when there is a limited amount of players that can play the content that is available for only a limited time. I see it as win-win for all to add instances, but seems like there is a...

No, instances do not ruin markup. What ruins markup is a lack of demand, coupled with oversupply and desire to undercut to get a sale. Resource mayhem is the strongest proof we have that the lack of demand is the main culprit. Oversupply will be here whether instances are here or not. If there...

Unless Im reading too much into what you are saying, it sounds like there are not enough areas with those mobs. Here are some solutions: Add additional areas (short term solution, and might need to add even more areas in future as playerbase grows in dps and skills as more players might...

If it were up to me, I would combine the storage potential we currently have spread across the universe into one universal storage. Also, merge the auction house into a single auction, rather than split per planet. This will naturally make the lootable aspect of space pointless, which I think...

There is just so much that can go wrong when increasing the storage limit. We could get additional vegetation issues... You know, there is more than 1 planet in the game. 500 storage limit per planet. ;) Has anyone counted how much storage we have across the universe?

Blizzard. Look at Warcraft 3 remastered. The upgrade was a complete mess and a good example of what I feel we are seeing here with this game. Yea, it sucks. It was a real shock when the new UI update landed on us in its unfinished state. The armor update was imo pretty bad too, as in I dont...