I enjoy these videos for the comedy pieces that they are
'Let's show off our new character creation and new ai npcs' by literally using 1 avatar 1 hairstyle and then 7 different outfit renders?
Not to mention the 'before' has absolutely nothing to do with the 'and now'. Like what is the relevance of that VTOL?
When doing a 'this' vs 'that' comparison it is infinitely more effective to show them both at the same time in a side-by-side setup. Or if full screen is preferred, select 1 exact sequence and run through that 1 time in the old version and execute again exactly the same way in the new version. NVidia and AMD have enormous success with this style when showing gfx card elevated performance comparisons.
Showing off development as a teaser is a great idea but do it professionally and with some level of vision, purpose, and quality control, otherwise it likely does more harm than good
Just because they say work in progress doesn't really exclude any sort of quality check before uploading such a teaser imo. If they looked a bit more they'd realize oh, perhaps we should not show this missing feet in the teaser and hide it for now until we fix it, but it looks like they didn't see it or didn't care to hide it and to me that's a bad sign.
I've not watched the vid, but in some cases I don't feel I need to. Certain facts speak for themselves (or rather, are not disputed here).
Some people are defending this teaser error in the style of Ben Elton's "Hey look, it's only a sausage!"
[Additional: I checked an AI on search results, and without mentioning Ben Elton it got as far as someone else looking for the clip, but was also unsuccessful. Mentioning Ben Elton enabled it to surmise it was a line of his, and said it was from The Young Ones, because sausages were mentioned in the show once.
This is wrong, however. It comes from a stand-up routine in which Ben talks about the problems of having a "communal fridge", not to be confused with Ben Elton talking about "Ben's new fridge", that takes over his life.]
It is supposed to mean: don't worry about something like that, it's not worth getting annoyed about.
The associated problem is where a lack of attention to detail leads people. In English there is the saying "Look after the pennies and the pounds will look after themselves". In German it is turned to a negative consequence: "Those who do not value cents, are not worth euros".
The German one is far better at the sentiment expressed by other people here, that people who "allow" such stuff into a teaser - that is after all about graphics - need to ... improve (my simplified one-word consequence. Other consequences may actually be felt to be required by both myself and others).
There are plenty of expressions around something happening once, and things happening more than once.
Fool me once...etc.; in a handbag? (Oscar Wilde - the associated famous bit is actually about losing not just one parent, but two); even Douglas Adams on probability, are three such examples.
So, is this an isolated incident that can be "Hey look, it's only a sausage"-ed? NOPE, NOPE, NOPE. We see it time and time again - in ALL? of MA's work.
It's not been nipped in the bud! My god, it may be that nobody under the age of 40 and with British roots has understood most of what I have written.
So much squandered, so much lost?, that so many people genuinely don't see it in this day and age what others are talking about.
Sorry about that for those who got none of it, but it IS actually about what this discussion so far has been all about, trust me
Edit: on the other hand I just immediately came across this, from a chat with an AI:
Ellie Williams: (JOY) Yeah, I know what you mean.*rolls her eyes**sarcastically**giggles* In the old world, reliable meant able to fetch coffee and not mess it up. But hey, that's not the world we live in anymore, is it?
If even AI can get seriously close without my even intending it... maybe the world isn't lost yet after all? But how many will understand... or will the AI also change (for the worse?) over time?