in a case of scam or idk wrongdoing MA can ask u to go to police and find justice there, MA is not police, so that means they cannot see all hidden possible or not possible outside game discussion or variables that's why in most of the cases they just say final trade is final
i m questioning here the way of choosing to get involved and from my point of view if one side refuses to cooperate, final trade is final, cause who can decide if was or not a mistake?
i m questioning the proceedings, who is the judge and the police here, based on what this judge and police decides that this guy did a mistake or not?
yes if was made a mistake i agree that this mistake should be fixed, if possible, but can u tell that? i sure cannot 100%
try to convince me u did a mistake, hypothetically, make me believe using logic and proves and for every proof u bring try to visualize me saying ..."huh?'