Shadowsong
Stalker
- Joined
- Jul 26, 2006
- Posts
- 1,554
- Location
- South Africa
- Society
- Freelancer
- Avatar Name
- Krystal Shadowsong Nova
Whenever there is a discussion around the sustainability of EU, one of the arguments put forth by those who believe EU will never crash is the following:
"Massive withdrawals cannot hurt EU, because somebody else had to deposit to buy the skills/gear/whatever, so money comes in to replace the money leaving"
Until two days ago, that argument was difficult to refute. Now consider what has happened during the "ongoing exploit investigation", during which numerous accounts were temporarily locked.
To the best of our knowledge, this "exploit" resulted in an account or accounts, being credited with amounts in excess of the actual deposits made. These "surplus funds" (or imaginary funds, if you like) were then apparently spent in a high-end shopping spree, purchasing numerous expensive items, from skill implants to armour.
So far, not a single avatar has reported that any of these transactions has been reversed. The items and skills are gone, and the ped remain. The totally imaginary, undeposited, fake peds have suddenly become very real, and are available for withdrawal. As far as we know.
So we have a situation where an unkown number of ped can be withdrawn as dollars, without the requisite influx of dollars to balance the system. Where does that leave us? Can we be as confident in the sustainability of this universe as we thought, when we have such a clear example that one of the building blocks of this confidence may be flawed?
Now before you all yell that it's an exceptional case, very rare, and that MA dealt with it swiftly, let me say this very clearly :
I AGREE WITH ALL OF THOSE THINGS.
HOWEVER.
I do not believe that MA has dealt with it correctly.
If the imaginary peds are allowed to remain in EU as real cash, and we have no indication of whether the items will remain in circulation - (remember, they were bought with imaginary peds, so even their TT value is 100% profit to whoever has them, but they have no value to MA as input into the system) - then we must acknowledge that the universe has been unbalanced. Only MA can know by how much, and only MA can tell us how the balance is to be restored, without effectively punishing the NON-EXPLOITING players through reduced loot, increased bug decays and other loss-inducing mechanisms. Oh, and those are quite prevalent at the moment.
I think this is damaging EU far more than many would like to admit. One of my mates described this as yet another "take more" VU, and I'm worried he may be right.
So, feel free to preface your responses with the usual chorus of "the sky is falling", but understand that there are a number of people who are very concerned about how this is resolved.
"Massive withdrawals cannot hurt EU, because somebody else had to deposit to buy the skills/gear/whatever, so money comes in to replace the money leaving"
Until two days ago, that argument was difficult to refute. Now consider what has happened during the "ongoing exploit investigation", during which numerous accounts were temporarily locked.
To the best of our knowledge, this "exploit" resulted in an account or accounts, being credited with amounts in excess of the actual deposits made. These "surplus funds" (or imaginary funds, if you like) were then apparently spent in a high-end shopping spree, purchasing numerous expensive items, from skill implants to armour.
So far, not a single avatar has reported that any of these transactions has been reversed. The items and skills are gone, and the ped remain. The totally imaginary, undeposited, fake peds have suddenly become very real, and are available for withdrawal. As far as we know.
So we have a situation where an unkown number of ped can be withdrawn as dollars, without the requisite influx of dollars to balance the system. Where does that leave us? Can we be as confident in the sustainability of this universe as we thought, when we have such a clear example that one of the building blocks of this confidence may be flawed?
Now before you all yell that it's an exceptional case, very rare, and that MA dealt with it swiftly, let me say this very clearly :
I AGREE WITH ALL OF THOSE THINGS.
HOWEVER.
I do not believe that MA has dealt with it correctly.
If the imaginary peds are allowed to remain in EU as real cash, and we have no indication of whether the items will remain in circulation - (remember, they were bought with imaginary peds, so even their TT value is 100% profit to whoever has them, but they have no value to MA as input into the system) - then we must acknowledge that the universe has been unbalanced. Only MA can know by how much, and only MA can tell us how the balance is to be restored, without effectively punishing the NON-EXPLOITING players through reduced loot, increased bug decays and other loss-inducing mechanisms. Oh, and those are quite prevalent at the moment.
I think this is damaging EU far more than many would like to admit. One of my mates described this as yet another "take more" VU, and I'm worried he may be right.
So, feel free to preface your responses with the usual chorus of "the sky is falling", but understand that there are a number of people who are very concerned about how this is resolved.