This is false, most sweaters can't find there way out of a brown paper bag and the others are bots. Not all of them. But often is definitely not the correct word to use.
Whether the
often form is true, false, or too noncommittal to call, I agree that it was not the best choice of words; it would be better to say that players who Sweat are
paradigmatically in a rapid growth stage of researching and absorbing tons of information about Entropia's features, systems, markets, etc., or something like that.
Calling most sweaters incompetent is a baseless claim.
most are just watching a show/movie or playing multiple accounts/games etc and will not improve unless they get a lucky hit at some point...I see it every single day in game, on the forums, in real life...So not just sweaters are incompetent but many non sweaters as well.
There
is some kernel of truth in Draniie's claim, but it risks conveying the wrong message for at least two reasons. Note that during an earlier era of Entropia, the claim would have been seen as obviously absurd, or a joke, as the Entropia community has traditionally been regarded as one of the most competent and excellent communities on the entire Internet.
The first issue is that competence is context-dependent. Short of
really getting to know an individual beyond most common online interactions, it is hard to distinguish between incompetence and unapplied competence. It could be that modern Entropian development actually is
selecting for incompetent new players, indeed likely those players least suited to deriving much value from the Entropia Universe concept, or it could be that it is merely
signaling to new players that Entropia is not an environment to which applying competence is appropriate or worthwhile. Both are tragic, but it is hard to tell what proportions of each we're dealing with.
The second issue that is even to the extent the claim is true, the false implicature is that the outcome is either the fault of the community, or "just the way things are," whereas in fact on either interpretation of the first issue, it is largely the terrible downstream consequence of myopic development. Reiterating, the Entropia community has traditionally been regarded as
one of the most competent and excellent communities on the entire Internet. It is, in the first moment, not the Entropian that is incompetent, but a distorted mental representation of the Entropian that has grown evermore cognitively nonfunctional with each passing year. It is the
perception and
presumption of the Entropian as incompetent when features and systems are designed which first blazes the destructive path; only then, in a hollowed universe which has consistently prioritized fixed over growth mindset, simplification and streamlining over interesting and thought-provoking tradeoff, mission/achievement/job/chore assignment over metagame, pre-bundling over compositionality and strategic causal interaction, intuition adherence over transformative creativity amenability, that the
real Entropia community grows so torn between the Entropia Universe concept and modern Entropia Universe development practices that even
some of us fail to find the competence emblematic of the traditional Entropian manifested anywhere in the wild.