Ok, here is my ethical question:
I have tried to convice a few people at the sweating grounds to just find an hour of extra work a week and use the money to depo rather than spend 40 hours a week sweating. A lot of them refused on the basis that they want the game to be fully 'free' and not spend real life cash on it.
So I came up with another idea, I know another online game where if you play it you can make up to 26 cents an hour on it consistently (and it is in fact impossible to deposit or lose cash on this game). The game is, also in my opinion at least, much more fun to play then sweating consistently.
Would it be wrong for me to recommend that they play that game instead of sweating to make $10, and then cash out of that game, and buy gun + ammo in this game because it would take them about 2.5 times less time to get the same amount and have fun in this game sooner?
I have tried to convice a few people at the sweating grounds to just find an hour of extra work a week and use the money to depo rather than spend 40 hours a week sweating. A lot of them refused on the basis that they want the game to be fully 'free' and not spend real life cash on it.
So I came up with another idea, I know another online game where if you play it you can make up to 26 cents an hour on it consistently (and it is in fact impossible to deposit or lose cash on this game). The game is, also in my opinion at least, much more fun to play then sweating consistently.
Would it be wrong for me to recommend that they play that game instead of sweating to make $10, and then cash out of that game, and buy gun + ammo in this game because it would take them about 2.5 times less time to get the same amount and have fun in this game sooner?