It might be an accident. Happened to my wife a while ago too on an amp.
She added all PEDs available instead of a normal bid.
Oh, and MA support doesn't care about this .
lolIt might be an accident. Happened to my wife a while ago too on an amp.
She added all PEDs available instead of a normal bid.
Oh, and MA support doesn't care about this .
It's still 15k......
What was the price for an ML35 again?
TBH this looks more like an honest misstake. Someone put the pedcard in and clicked the leftmost arrow and whoops all the peds on the card went into a bid on an item with no buyout.
Wouldnt a manipulator set a buyout there, to make sure that no one knew who sold or bought the item, not giving people 24 hours to see it?
Iono tho, could be a couple of really dumb ones too .
opening bid would be set lower then ...
i.e 1 ped and not a couple hundred
LOL im nááb and have to learn to read.
You should really send an support case, i hate these guys.
Does it show somewhere where the 'opening' bid was ?
if you look on the pic, you can see that the opening bis IS 936ped and current bid is 963ped.
Carry on with the whining thread about this whilst you hoard the things that suit your very own 'market manipulation' pink man.
It might be an accident. Happened to my wife a while ago too on an amp.
She added all PEDs available instead of a normal bid.
Oh, and MA support doesn't care about this .
Unlikely so, the opening bid is outragious, for two people to make a mistake, one listing it and then the other to make the bid I think is highly improbable.
Does it show somewhere where the 'opening' bid was ?
If the 2nd guy accidentally put his entire ped card on the bid - wouldn't that make it the opening / starting bid - seeing as he's the only bidder and there is no buyout.
No .. I look again and still the opening / current bid are both 963.
No variance in the number there ..
I thought maybe if someone bid on something and there wasn't a bid previous to their bid - suddenly the opening bid would be moved to whatever they had bid.
I was incorrect.
Carry on with the whining thread about this whilst you hoard the things that suit your very own 'market manipulation' pink man.
plz clearify....
useless ramble blah blah ..
LOL cry more sweat reseller.
You will actually see on THIS thread that I admitted I was incorrect.
I thought something totally different happened when someone put the first bid up.
SURPRISE - had nothing to do with you, moron.
I'm so sorry I called you a dick and you had to whine about it.
But - if the shoe fits - wear it, Dick.
Have another nice -rep from me.
only makes you look bad, to try and make me look bad, jokes on you danielle.
This is someone with two accounts transfering peds from one to the other.
That's all.
I don't really think that makes it right but if that's the case then they should consider doing it with something which doesn't affect the market so drastically, perhaps some junk crafting components that aren't useful in anything and haven't sold in weeks on auction.
Or possibly use fast-user switching in windows to just perform a secure trade, it is possible to log on two accounts at once with only 1 PC, then they wouldn't pay the fee or screw up the market.