Remind me not to trade with anyone.... ever again... Seriously this is a daft point. Anyone can fraudulently deposit into the game with a stolen credit card or a credit card that they then cancel the deposit with. Same situation with any other business. Although its never been confirmed, the general feeling is that avoiding credit card issues is the main reason why withdrawals take so long.
Just my thoughts
Wistrel
I just think the name is purposefully deceptive, implying a relationship with MA that doesn't exist. So I would steer players away from it for that reason.
If you think there is no difference in trading and receiving peds for empty trade window... Then i would love to "trade" with you.
There is no possible way to prove that the peds you received was for service out of the game, while if you trade peds for items it is clearly seen that you pay for something. yeah withdrawal take long because of this reason. Normal players are not locked if they pay for items with peds (even when the goods come from avatar using hacks) (take Czarne Smoki case for example - hundreds of players traded with those guys and paid for items(i am sure i bought atleast 50 different items from them), and did not get locked, but i am sure if those guys gave free peds to someone then Mindark locked the ped receiving accounts also).
Mindark can tell a difference between a trade and receiving free peds(this is technically what this service is all about)
Wistrel, i'm not sure what your negrep about https://www.planetcalypsoforum.com/...not-endorsed&p=3096845&viewfull=1#post3096845 that was, kinda doesn't make any sense.
Aaaanyways, i never said, that MA has said anything about any of this, as you can see on that post, that i didn't say, that they said anything, yet you negrep me for saying that they said something, or... what? Yea, i'm a bit clueless.
Or is this just a random negrep party going on?
i remember when it was zehx that did this and not entropia partners....
First of all, the whole post started with a word "maybe", implying that i'm speculating, at best, not stating anything.I can't actually remember what I wrote but I think your post definitely implys MA don't like Entropia Partners and states a reason why this might be true.
"Czarne Smoki case". Can you explain what that was?
Wistrel
What happened?
While you are at it there are a lot of other web sites with Entropia in the name that are entirely independent run operations and nothing to do with Mindark. Certainly keep them away from entropiawiki.com entropiabay entropiaforum com and pl as well as entropiaplanets. These are all run by deceptive people who shouldn't be trusted. Some even ask for subscription money to help keep the sites operational!l
Entropia Partners. Can you see the difference?
Thanks for your feedback. I think the intent is deceptive. I have no problems with people disagreeing with my view on the matter.
Regards,
KikkiJikki
Is it deceptive? From a certain viewpoint, yes. The word Partner is used in order to make customers feel validated.
<words>
There is a minor detail on the website that makes it break the EULA: Eula prohibits any form of gambling, but this web site has a raffle part. If web site with raffle is mentioned ingame, and the winnings from the raffle is paid out in PEDs, it's likely to break that no-gambling rule.
Beside that, there is this thing: From where does the money come that are being paid out?
The conclusion I got (without having to register), was that you get paid by viewing sponsored films. That is, films that the a company, for instance, pays to get the video shown - and the company who's "sponsoring" the clips does so because they want products sold or something like that, that is, they want real people to look at the clips. Also, (the way I think google advertisement looks), they want to aim the clips to people who are interested in the same topic.
If it's that way it works, it's a kind of fraud: Someone has found out a way that if they host videos on a webpage (similar to adwords/sponsored links), they get paid by the advertisement company. The person who is hosting the clips (using frame or similar) probably have signed an agreement that they won't try to cheat on the system by "autoclicking" on the ads (clips) themselves. Now to get around that, they pay real life users to view the movies. So, it's a fraud because the hoster get paid by the advertisement company for clicks that should be generated by real users while the clicks are generated by paid persons who just clicks and doesn't look on the content.
Another example could be an artist that gets paid by youtube a certain amount/view, and this is a way to boost the number of views and that the artist gets more money paid out than they "deserve".
if the money that is paid out is generated some other way (preferably more ethical), then (for the sake of the service itself to show it legitimacy) should explain in depth how it works.
Another part is the distribution of PEDs. An end user have no way of knowing how these PEDs came ingame. A rouge company could be paying out with PEDs from stolen CCs - and as in MAs eyes it's a one-way transaction (gift) it would look like whoever accept the PEDs is a part of the scamming scheme and if a withdrawal comes maybe even like a "gateway" to get stolen PEDs out of game into IRL cash.
One thing that makes this look fishy is that it doesn't seem there is any official main address anywhere. There is a contact page but it doesn't mention any business address. And the domain is registered in India, and the website is hoted in Florida (prejudice I have about Florida web hosting: Spammer haven).
You are performing a job (really out-of-game), and depending on where you live, you would have a hard time to explain for your local tax authority from where (which company) those money came (if you want to be honest).
There is a minor detail on the website that makes it break the EULA: Eula prohibits any form of gambling, but this web site has a raffle part. If web site with raffle is mentioned ingame, and the winnings from the raffle is paid out in PEDs, it's likely to break that no-gambling rule.