Fat Fock Adam
Provider
- Joined
- Jul 14, 2011
- Posts
- 148
- Location
- Sweden
- Society
- The Knights of Calypso
- Avatar Name
- Fat Fóck Adam
I am sure this has been discussed over and over again, but since I am a newbie I thought I'd bring it up again, might be some fresh info that has changed over the VU updates.
My question is this, if you are trying to hunt eco (to a certain extent), in other words, your goal is to brake even, or as close to it as possible, when is it justifiable to use UL weapons?
I would like to use a weapon that is for newbie mobs: Argo/Drones/Feff/Molisk/etc. and the two I looked at was Imp-EP-21 and Adj Hero, which both seem to be very economical and about the right dps.
Atm I use a p4a L with a104 amp, but the MU on it is 110% and sometimes auc dun have any.
I did some tests with the weapon compare tool on entropedia, and most UL weapons start to be equal in dmg/pec when hit/dmg is 80ish (IMK.II at roughly 70ish).
Results:
I used 40 in hit and dmg profession as an indication (since I am close to that)
Imp-EP-21: 2.508 dmg/pec, dps: 20.42 (no amp)
Adj Hero: 2.497 dmg/pec, dps: 19,68 (no amp)
P4a (L): 2,844 dmg/pec, dps 15.57 (no amp, MU 110% since that is current price on auc)
Imp-EP-21 (with 84 hit and 83 dmg): 2,844 dmg/pec, 23,15 dps
Adj hero (with 84 in hit/dmg): 2,844 dmg/pec, 22,42 dps
So does these results mean that one should avoid UL weapons until one has 80+ in hit and dmg profession?
Anyone know anything about sights and scopes? Some believe that they improve your chance to hit, but the Hit: x/10 and Crit hit x/10 do not change, the scope description however mentions that the scope adds hitchance when mobs are not at melee range (but there is no visible indication of this). So is it stupid to use scopes and sights when one does not know how much it improves chance to hit? (I know they add x skill modifier, but this is irrelevant, since I am in no rush with the skills, just want to know what weapon choices I have).
And one final thought, a lot of people believe that hunting somewhat uneco is ok, since the more expenses you have the bigger return you get, I am not sure I believe this, but I do get "pitty" globals and hofs from MA when I have had a very bad period (bad period = an average return of 50-70% on roughly 5-6 hunts in a row)
Well I welcome all thoughts and answers.
My question is this, if you are trying to hunt eco (to a certain extent), in other words, your goal is to brake even, or as close to it as possible, when is it justifiable to use UL weapons?
I would like to use a weapon that is for newbie mobs: Argo/Drones/Feff/Molisk/etc. and the two I looked at was Imp-EP-21 and Adj Hero, which both seem to be very economical and about the right dps.
Atm I use a p4a L with a104 amp, but the MU on it is 110% and sometimes auc dun have any.
I did some tests with the weapon compare tool on entropedia, and most UL weapons start to be equal in dmg/pec when hit/dmg is 80ish (IMK.II at roughly 70ish).
Results:
I used 40 in hit and dmg profession as an indication (since I am close to that)
Imp-EP-21: 2.508 dmg/pec, dps: 20.42 (no amp)
Adj Hero: 2.497 dmg/pec, dps: 19,68 (no amp)
P4a (L): 2,844 dmg/pec, dps 15.57 (no amp, MU 110% since that is current price on auc)
Imp-EP-21 (with 84 hit and 83 dmg): 2,844 dmg/pec, 23,15 dps
Adj hero (with 84 in hit/dmg): 2,844 dmg/pec, 22,42 dps
So does these results mean that one should avoid UL weapons until one has 80+ in hit and dmg profession?
Anyone know anything about sights and scopes? Some believe that they improve your chance to hit, but the Hit: x/10 and Crit hit x/10 do not change, the scope description however mentions that the scope adds hitchance when mobs are not at melee range (but there is no visible indication of this). So is it stupid to use scopes and sights when one does not know how much it improves chance to hit? (I know they add x skill modifier, but this is irrelevant, since I am in no rush with the skills, just want to know what weapon choices I have).
And one final thought, a lot of people believe that hunting somewhat uneco is ok, since the more expenses you have the bigger return you get, I am not sure I believe this, but I do get "pitty" globals and hofs from MA when I have had a very bad period (bad period = an average return of 50-70% on roughly 5-6 hunts in a row)
Well I welcome all thoughts and answers.