I thought i we had this discussion in another thread?
you have no evidence to make these serious allegations against the previous employees and when i challenged you about this you back-pedalled and denied you were making accusations:
so now you have gone from not accusing the previous employees of infecting the NI website with trojans, even though the infection started some time before the firing, to accusing them of hacking his twitter feed.
you do understand if there was any chance this was true that it would be trivial for Mr Post to have this looked into and any ex employee would be in serious trouble?
how about we do something that is normal when someone comes up with a wild conspiracy theory and apply occams razor, the simplest explanation is the most likely one?
the infection of the NI site was most likely caused by either a rogue advertisement from a offsite service or due to a poorly configured website, low staffing/morale is the reason this went unnoticed or was not dealt with in a timely manner, poor management oversight could be a contributing factor.
and the tweets, i see no difference in tone or style (right down to the poor spelling) between the "hacked" mr. post or the "real" mr post, they both posted the same links to the NI site.
We have a "developer" and investor who has sunk large amounts of money into a project that seems to be in serious trouble, he is probably upset/angry about this, as in his own words this was fulfilling a childhood dream, he wouldnt be the first person to be dangerously close to a twitter-enabled phone while "hacking" a bottle of whiskey?
those are my thoughts