Does everyone have blinders on?

Status

Luvly Luv

Provider
Joined
Jan 13, 2006
Posts
118
I have only posted once on this forum, and was severly dissappointed by the lack of discussion or follow up by the community at large. In my post under "Neverdie" I pointed out some discrepencies in what was publicly stated and what is publicy recorded. Since then, I have been trying to understand how our "virtual" economy works and what is gained by the "Project Entropia".

What I do know is that the game is not as advertised. What I don't know is why. I am once again posting in an effort to understand what was briefly enjoyable, but now feels more like fraud.

I do not take the word fraud lightly. However, classic pyramid schemes are often structured in a similar way as Project Entropia appears to be.

The CNN report that drew me to this game claimed that this was a virtual world with a "real cash economy". In the real world, economies are transparent and data regarding that economy are available to the public for protection against fraud/monopolies, etc. What I find disheartening is that the "real cash economy" does not appear to have any checks/balances and seems to elude even the most advanced user in exactly how it works.

Upon first starting the game, I made a small deposit upon which I was charged a fee. This was not a problem for me, as I understand that the overhead and profits must come from somewhere. This would appear to be a valid place for that in a "real cash economy".

Next I found that decay is a real dollar cost, and no one seems to have the straight answer on what percentage of a deposit that fee will be. The posts and statements I have read have all stated that this is MindArks profit for the game. Ok, I thought the charge for the deposit was covering that.

So now we have two identified fees for playing the game, an initial fee, and an ongoing fee unless you do nothing but trade or craft. Well, this is double taxation in a real cash economy. Now I am really concerned about what I have invested time and real money into.

Next is the trade terminal. To hunt you either use ranged or melee weapons. A ranged weapon requires ammo which is sold solely by the game developer, and a melee weapon decays. Ok, logically I assume that all loots are generated by the purchase of ammo at the trade terminal, and distributed back to the general population by some mathematical equation set into the game. BUT....big but here, does a melee weapon individual contribute to the loot pool when he/she repairs their blade, or are they contributing to the costs/profits of the game developer via decay? Hmmm

Decay is agreed to be an operating expense...but why this contradiction? Are we a transparent community that can grasp and make educated decisions based on public knowledge? Or are we a group of individuals being frauded out of real dollars in a vain attempt for fun, social interaction and heaven forbid a little profit?

Ok, I can't understand the hunting system, so I won't participate. No big deal, there are other things to do in PE. So let's try mining. But wait, probes/bombs are sold only through the Trade Terminal. Are we going to experience the same inconsistencies that we saw with ranged/melee? We do. There is no proof that each bomb/probe is put back into the economy of PE. Again, a "real cash economy" that has no checks or balances. And alot of people with high skills are complaining in the forums about the loot system for mining also. So something might not be right here either.

Crafting? Well, someone with 50k engineering on this board has stated that the crafting is so messed up that they will not participate anymore. And as a crafter with 100 qr on bps, I can say personally that there is no sense of what the cos is, or how to make a sound decision based on it. Again, failures go directly back to the game developer, and are not ensured to be poot into the loot pool. No checks and balances here ither.

Now we get to active players. MA does not release how many are online at anytime, only how many have registered. And reports I get are that some inactive avatars take years to be deleted. Their own reports and the general agreement is that only 3-5% of all new players deposit and play the game. 350,000 registered accounts at that figure mean 17,500 regular players. Lets say 24 million dollars is the amount deposited in the last fiscal year. That means that each player is expected to deposit $1,450 someodd dollars each year. That means each and every regular player can on average expect to pay $1,500 per year for this game. With a quick hunt costing 100 ped in ammo, it is easy to see how some avatars can deposit many times more than this per year.

Now, where do I get the feeling that fraud may be occuring? Well, a classic pyramid scheme rewards those at the top (first players) by giving them a portion of the payments of those on the bottom (new players). This system keeps repeating itself with more and more levels until the whole thing collapses. With no way of knowing how many users are logged into the game at anytime, how are we the paying public to know if this might occur?

Many of you have invested much more than the $1,400 per year into this game. I have heard you talking about depositing 500-1,000 per month personally. This is real money with no accountability. And it is advertised as a "game". Best case scenario, I view this as gambling with a neat social inter-action. Worst case....well, how many of you have had the same doubts I am expressing?

If this is in fact gambling, shouldn't a warning be posted like on-line gambling sites? Shouldn't an age verification be required so as not to take advantage of young people who are not yet capable of making sound judgements financially? Or do you, the users, condone the exploitation of youths? In as pleasant an environment as PE, I find that hard to believe.

Basically, I am expecting, and require, some debate regarding these topics. As a depositer, my decision on whether to pursue other avenues will be based on what occurs in this thread.
 
Stop thinking. have fun

I don't have blinders on, I just play the game and enjoy :dunce: like I have done 3 years :cool:
 
Last edited:
Life is about choices, some choose to spend their money going to the movies or to a club, others choose to spend money in PE.

I think avid players know what they are getting themselves into, we just decide to burn our money through PE.

Is it smart? probably not. Then again, smoking, drinking, and so many other habits are not the smartest either but people still do it.

Perhaps playing, spending our time and money in PE is not exactly the smartest way to spend your savings, but we choose to do it regardless because even if in the end things don't end up the way we want them too, at least I know I got alot of entertainment out of it.

Thats my answer, I'm not blind, It's really not something to debate about, it's a matter of choice and playing PE is a personal choice.
 
It's not an investment but instead is gaming/gambling. My fiance and I blew $300 at a casino on New Years Eve and considered it entertainment and this is the same.

Just because it has a cash economy doesn't mean that the average player will come out ahead. Consider MA a big socialist government. They own the stores, the factories and every means of commerce except the blackmarket (trading, and be looking for them to tax this soon ;-)). They get their PEDs coming and going. Unlike the real world we the citizens have a choice in whether or not we participate.
 
Luvly Luv said:
Basically, I am expecting, and require, some debate regarding these topics. As a depositer, my decision on whether to pursue other avenues will be based on what occurs in this thread.
If you need someone else to tell you why you should stay in PE (or in any other game), I think it's time for you to move on ;)

That said, from what I've understood from your post, you're thinking you can earn regularly in PE without making big deposits (100$ / mo isn't big, imo). Then, you're quite wrong. Imho, you can "play" PE in 2 ways :
- For fun : in that case, you deposit what you're willing to loose and you just enjoy the time you're playing
- For money : in that case, you should think a little more about how and how much to invest in PE to make money.
 
Hi my name is Rawen and im an addict.



Well not far from the truth anyway. Ive been playing for like hmm 1,5 years or so now not really sure exaktly. But I think you are making some valid points imo and Ive thought in the same lines. Imo there are three types of players in here.

1. The addict: constantly stating no problem here MA is great not minding the loss of peds and pushing in more to some day reach that uber hof.

(A lill note here thou. Some ppl like the game hard and do spend alot both time and money. But they also see the truth and works to make PE a better place.)

2. The sometimer: The person not really caring to hard that puts in some cash from time to time and enjoy the experience trying to have some fun on the way but still returns to normal if things go bad in game they go irl.

3. The starter: They try it realise they didnt have al to much fun for the money spent and ditch.


What you should be adviced of early is that this place is a good place to be if you know what you are heading into. Dont expeckt to gain peds. Dont expekt to do profit. Put a budget for say 200 ped a month and stick to it no matter what unless you can afford to spend more.


Imo this is kinda similar to a drug habit. Some ppl will not be able to pay their rents cause of PE in time some ppl wont have the time they need with their kids some will loose thier loved ones. Habits have a way of making that happen and maybe this is what will cause PE some problems in the future.

I wouldnt like to se the system that has been spoken about implenting in China thou. The state cuts gaming after a 4 hour period.



I know il get some real kicks for this one and im asuming mostly from lv1 players ;).
But I do think some of this might be a problem.
(Sry for jumping between questions but kinda hard to stand ontopic whit so many questions and so much alcohol in me weins.)
 
First of all Mikah, quit posting damn it. My posts today have all been right after you ;)

Lady, its not blinders. Its that we don't care in my case anyways. There are discrepancies in everything and people look for them in everything, especially when money is involved. Some people find discrepancies when there really aren't any. To your legal questions (Gambling, min. age etc.) This game is governed by Swedish law and I don't know swedish law. If they aren't in compliance then the governing bodies of Sweden have been blind for the last 3 years.

Edit: I have no interest in getting rich playing PE. Will I complain if I get a 90000 PED ATH of course not. Will I withdraw? probably not I am just here to have fun.
 
:eek: Holy Crap!!!

You mean they are taking my money!!! OMG, I should stop playing. You mean that I am getting screwed!! Thank you for showing me the light :bowdown:
Basically, I am expecting, and require, some debate regarding these topics. As a depositer, my decision on whether to pursue other avenues will be based on what occurs in this thread.

Soooo, you saying that if we dont talk you out of leaving you will ?? :confused:

One thing i do know. If MA awnsered all of your questions, you might know how the system works...If you knew that you could make alot of money, everyone could, and that would be bad for MA ;)

There are alot of smart people out there, ones that know of PE and view it as a great hack, if they succeed........even the slightest info would help :tongue2:

Honestly, PE fits my budget ATM......It's as simple as if I'm not happy, then it's my choice to deposit in PE (or scam, fraud, money sucking company,not accountable company, if you like theses better ;) )
 
PE is a game or a virtual environment for social fun. I am constantly amazed at the number of people who saw or read an article on CNN and thought that PE would be a great way to make a living from their living room without having to actually work. Do these same people rush out to buy the new XBOX 360 hoping to compete in game tournaments and make a living gaming with Microsoft.

Grow up people. You are logged onto the internet, not contributing anything creative or substantial and yet you have the expectation of earning money from a virtual environment that is the product of countless hours of creative programming and investment of some nerds (I mean that in a nice way) from Sweden.

Seriously, logon, have fun and then spend some time with real people in the real world. BTW, try EverQuest 2, it is another fun online game and will cost you much less in the long run.
 
I wish people would stop worrying and start having fun -thats why you joined after all ehy? If you joined bc of the money Id ask you to quit anyway.

You dont *have* to pay anything and yes, PE is more challanging then most games, but I guess thats what makes it so exciting for many.

Bottom line is, you yourself choose your style of play.
 
I agree to an extent... I would be inclined to deposit a *LOT* more if I could look at this like a business, but unfortunately it's not (for us anyway)

It's just some high end entertainment for high end prices... I enjoy playing, and the community.... so I chose to press on. If my intentions were purely financial, I would have never touched this game in the first place.
 
The creator of this thread has made some very good points about this 'environment' (not game) that need to be addressed.

If it weren't for the fact that MA/PE was based in Sweden, and protected by the laws of that country, it would not be running anywhere else.
If PE were to setup in North America, Britain, France (to name a few), they could not get away with this secrecy. If they tried, they would not be allowed to operate.

To top it all off, MA has made a deal with Bridge Investments, a tax shelter, to float their first IPO. I can guarentee that the investors know more about how MA works that the players; otherwise they would have never invested. How is that fair to the players? It isn't.

MA can't even answer the simplest of all questions: How many people are playing at once? Why is this so secret? Is it because there are only 100-200 people on at any given time of day? Is it because those 350k accounts you go on about are 99% inactive? Is it because most ppl deposit once, then leave?

Lots of hard questions that customers of MA will never see an answer to.
 
The CNN report that drew me to this game claimed that this was a virtual world with a "real cash economy". In the real world, economies are transparent and data regarding that economy are available to the public for protection against fraud/monopolies, etc. What I find disheartening is that the "real cash economy" does not appear to have any checks/balances and seems to elude even the most advanced user in exactly how it works.

Oh really ?

I'll pay you 10 PEDs for the full legislation of how money is issue by the Federal Reserve or by the Central European Bank, how much was issued and how much was taken out of circulation, the entire internal rules that regulates the issue of money by those 2 banks. Who are the owners of those 2 banks and which percentage they have (if higher than 1%).
Where do they apply their profits and at which taxation are they forced to pay to the goverments of the countries that use the coin they issue.

Do you want to worry about something ?
Worry about real life ...
:wise:

About PE you can find some more interesting info for your further knowledge at:
http://www.mindark.com/

Yes I'm not happy with many things in game and I would like to understand a few issues that you've raised.

That doesn't mean that I won't try to inform myself the best I can.
And if you read all the above and try to get more information about it you'll see that there are some major mistakes in your post.
 
I am glad that we are at least having a discussion regarding this, but I think that my most important question raised has not been addressed. I am an adult and don't mind spending "x" amount of dollars for entertainment. However, I am also a parent, and someone who tries not to take advantage of others. Most of the posts have so far acknowledged a casino type environment of the game. What about the youths who play this game? As adults we should all be concerned about encouraging gambling in immature people, and we should also try not to exploit them. Many might say "how many kids have credit cards?" My answer would be most, and a bank will give a Visa/Mastercard giftcard to any and all that ask. With the removal of the security 3 digit pin, illegal depositing also becomes a greater risk. If PE is a gambling site, shouldn't there be some regulation as to the age group of such? And shouldn't we as a responsible community make sure to regulate it ourselves? I am not nor have I ever had illusions that I could make money in this game, but I see serious problems with it marketed as a "game".
 
Luvly Luv said:
Upon first starting the game, I made a small deposit upon which I was charged a fee. This was not a problem for me, as I understand that the overhead and profits must come from somewhere. This would appear to be a valid place for that in a "real cash economy".

Next I found that decay is a real dollar cost, and no one seems to have the straight answer on what percentage of a deposit that fee will be. The posts and statements I have read have all stated that this is MindArks profit for the game. Ok, I thought the charge for the deposit was covering that.

So now we have two identified fees for playing the game, an initial fee, and an ongoing fee unless you do nothing but trade or craft. Well, this is double taxation in a real cash economy. Now I am really concerned about what I have invested time and real money into.

.
Its a bankfee wich is very common in the economic world ;) . Im sure you are familiar with the concept ;)
You can calculate your decay as this info is present on most forums or do some work and find out how much it is by yourself. Again its no " shady" fee at all.
 
Grykk said:
If it weren't for the fact that MA/PE was based in Sweden, and protected by the laws of that country, it would not be running anywhere else.
If PE were to setup in North America, Britain, France (to name a few), they could not get away with this secrecy. If they tried, they would not be allowed to operate.

lol tru, mostly because of the first unsatisfied rich kid (onyl cause they could sue at the drop of a dime), MA would get sued and be gone :laugh:
just my opinion tho :dunce:
 
I think you can clear up the majority of the problems you have with this is you stop using the word "investment" and substitute instead with "spent."

The main claim PE makes is that the game operates with a real cash economy; that's true, it features an exchangeable currency system. I have yet to see any official statements by Mindark that you are guaranteed to profit from this system (and, on that note, investments are not guaranteed anyway - hence the concept of risk vs. reward).

Double taxation: no, that's not the case. Double-taxation occurs when earnings are taxed at two levels, such as taxes on corporate income and again on dividends paid to shareholders. Mindark charges a fee for one service - depositing - and another fee for a seperate service - activities in game (i.e. playing the game itself). Think of it as paying admission to a movie theater, theme park, whatever, and paying again for food, merchandise, etc. in the venue.

Your pyramid scheme analogy doesn't work either. In a pyramid (ponzi) scheme, initial buyers are repaid when new buyers join the scheme below them. But following from what I said above about PE not guaranteeing a profit, merely the POSSIBILITY that one could, there is no pyramid scheme at work here: people who joined before others are not receiving the money the people who joined after are putting into the game - it's random who receives what and when, which is counter to the concept of a pyramid scheme (not to mention that an early adopting player doesn't receive anything when not logged in - a very important point!).

As to whether or not a "gambling warning" should be posted here - no. If you think it's gambling, it's because you're playing with the expectation or hope that you will get more money back than you put in. For those of us who play PE primarily for enjoyment, the notion of this being a gamble is nonsensical: the money I put in is money I consider spent on entertainment. If a big wad of PED falls into my lap, great. If not, oh well. I've put $20 into the game since October when I joined, and I still have roughly $10 worth of that left. As far as I'm concerned, the large mining strikes/globals I've made only serve to extend the "life" of my deposits, allowing me to play at the level I prefer to longer and more cheaply.

But, ultimately, I have this to say to you: if you're dissatisfied with PE, stop playing it! It's that simple. There's no good reason to make yourself miserable with a game.

Much loot,
Zim
 
Luvly Luv said:
I am glad that we are at least having a discussion regarding this, but I think that my most important question raised has not been addressed. I am an adult and don't mind spending "x" amount of dollars for entertainment. However, I am also a parent, and someone who tries not to take advantage of others. Most of the posts have so far acknowledged a casino type environment of the game. What about the youths who play this game? As adults we should all be concerned about encouraging gambling in immature people, and we should also try not to exploit them. Many might say "how many kids have credit cards?" My answer would be most, and a bank will give a Visa/Mastercard giftcard to any and all that ask. With the removal of the security 3 digit pin, illegal depositing also becomes a greater risk. If PE is a gambling site, shouldn't there be some regulation as to the age group of such? And shouldn't we as a responsible community make sure to regulate it ourselves? I am not nor have I ever had illusions that I could make money in this game, but I see serious problems with it marketed as a "game".

AND PARENTS SHOULD WATCH THEIR KIDS, NOT EVERYONE ELSE!!! :wise:

if a kid is playing PE , their parent should know, and ahould know about PE and educate thyself.
 
Isnt there (or it was, Im sure..) 16 year or 18 year agelimit really? I think so :scratch: used to be anyway :dunno:
In Norway, and I guess then in Sweden aswell, getting a VISA or MasterCard isnt something you get before you turn 18 without your parents allowing it (and then you have to be 16 aswell) so that issue is really mostly in the hands of the parents I guess.

What exactly can MA do? I mean, I agree kids under 16 shouldnt really play this game, and I kept my lil brother away from it for just that exact reason. But -if he joins saying he´s 20, what is MA gonna do? They cant put a detective at their asses.

About the removal of the digit code, it is something alot of us have sent support about and from what it seems its just temporary or it was possible to not having to push all digits after first time you have done so.


In my opinion, when it comes to underage kids, it should be the parents responsibility and not MA´s. Parents should follow up on what the kids are doing with their life right? I mean, if your kid started playing poker on net too you´d probably take affair with it.

Btw, its not markeded as a game,
its a virtual universe
with real cash economy

-and that is something MA states aaaaall the time.
 
Basically the same things as everyone else, play it because you enjoy it, I’ve only been play for about 3 months, I realised it's harder and takes alot more time to skill than other games, but it's not meant to be other games, it is what it is.
As for the advertisement thing, it's been proven time and time again in the real world that word of mouth is the best way to get a message across, sure it's easier to put it in the mainstream press, from my understanding Ferrari don't spend a cent on advertising, and we all know of the company, sure they have their own F1 team and merchandise, it's just an indirect way to advertise, so going on that, the indirect way that MA advertise is by selling a space station or a island, it generates interest in the real world.
 
Skam said:
Isnt there (or it was, Im sure..) 16 year or 18 year agelimit really? I think so :scratch: used to be anyway :dunno:
In Norway, and I guess then in Sweden aswell, getting a VISA or MasterCard isnt something you get before you turn 18 without your parents allowing it (and then you have to be 16 aswell) so that issue is really mostly in the hands of the parents I guess.

What exactly can MA do? I mean, I agree kids under 16 shouldnt really play this game, and I kept my lil brother away from it for just that exact reason. But -if he joins saying he´s 20, what is MA gonna do? They cant put a detective at their asses.

About the removal of the digit code, it is something alot of us have sent support about and from what it seems its just temporary or it was possible to not having to push all digits after first time you have done so.


In my opinion, when it comes to underage kids, it should be the parents responsibility and not MA´s. Parents should follow up on what the kids are doing with their life right? I mean, if your kid started playing poker on net too you´d probably take affair with it.

Btw, its not markeded as a game,
its a virtual universe
with real cash economy

-and that is something MA states aaaaall the time.

I am sorry, but it is marketed as entertainment, and I am sure that many users have spent their savings etc., on this game. At that point "entertainment" doesn't apply anymore, and gambling does. Online casino's are advertised as such, and this just seems to be a way to avoid having that disclaimer. As a parent, I know many children who subscribe to WoW (and other MMORPG's), with their parents permission because it is viewed as "entertainment". But this is not exactly packaged like that, and a quick perusal by the average person would not expose the complicated casino mentality. Again, I don't doubt many people view it as entertainment only, but it is MindArk's responsibility to ensure that no one who is underage has the ability to participate in gambling. At least that is how I interpret the rulings regarding online gambling. To be non-culpable in the United States, for example, MindArk would have to prove that the user circumvented their protections for underage gambling.
 
Luvly Luv said:
I am sorry, but it is marketed as entertainment, and I am sure that many users have spent their savings etc., on this game. At that point "entertainment" doesn't apply anymore, and gambling does. Online casino's are advertised as such, and this just seems to be a way to avoid having that disclaimer. As a parent, I know many children who subscribe to WoW (and other MMORPG's), with their parents permission because it is viewed as "entertainment". But this is not exactly packaged like that, and a quick perusal by the average person would not expose the complicated casino mentality. Again, I don't doubt many people view it as entertainment only, but it is MindArk's responsibility to ensure that no one who is underage has the ability to participate in gambling. At least that is how I interpret the rulings regarding online gambling. To be non-culpable in the United States, for example, MindArk would have to prove that the user circumvented their protections for underage gambling.

but would the US find this as gambling??? even if MA showed accountability for how the money flows?

and, im sorry, a 15$ a month game is one thing, if my kid started asking for more for a game, then id be worried. If you give a child 15$ a month in PE, and he does good with that......hell that kid needs to be in gifted classes ;)

and this is all just my opinion :D
 
Luvly Luv said:
I am sorry, but it is marketed as entertainment, and I am sure that many users have spent their savings etc., on this game. At that point "entertainment" doesn't apply anymore, and gambling does. Online casino's are advertised as such, and this just seems to be a way to avoid having that disclaimer. As a parent, I know many children who subscribe to WoW (and other MMORPG's), with their parents permission because it is viewed as "entertainment". But this is not exactly packaged like that, and a quick perusal by the average person would not expose the complicated casino mentality. Again, I don't doubt many people view it as entertainment only, but it is MindArk's responsibility to ensure that no one who is underage has the ability to participate in gambling. At least that is how I interpret the rulings regarding online gambling. To be non-culpable in the United States, for example, MindArk would have to prove that the user circumvented their protections for underage gambling.

Imo when it comes to the internet it should be the parent who takes the real responsibility. yea, MA as a serious company should warn people about it. But its not a casino, and their whole PR campagin is that it has a real cash economy. And I think its here people should start think for themself what this sentence means.

When it comes to underage kids using the internet, the parents who buys their kids WoW probably checks out what kind of game it is before they buy it? And so should they if they allow their kid to put money inside PE.

PE have before been blocked from CC companies bc they saw it as gambling, however they dropped the block after investigation -Doesnt that say something? Im not gonna go much into on how you play smart in the game -but its not gambling as you do have control over the odds and you dont have to put money in to play.
 
Luv,

You raise some very good points. Especially the one about melee (decay) vs. ranged (ammo) and the loot pool.

However, you are not the only person raising many of these concerns. See: https://www.planetcalypsoforum.com/forums/showthread.php?t=14667&page=1&pp=10 among others. This is not the first time "pyramid scheme" has come up, or casino.

There are many CND Noobs (as I call myself) who have passed the two-month mark and are getting to really understand the game mechanics--while staring in the face of the reality you describe. For now, the only answer I can give you myself is that whenever I think that this game might break me, I look around and see no other "game" like it--real-cash economy aside. I have stated many times that I am willing to pay up to $200/month to play this game, which is just below your $1,400 figure. However, I have yet to stay within that $200/month limit. When one considers that subscription-based games cost $15/month, offering $200 is substantial. If that is continually waved off as "not enough" or the "poor folk level," then MA needs to seriously hope that no one comes out with a game that offers whatever it is that makes us reach for that hypodermic needle known as the Deposit button.

Luv said:
Basically, I am expecting, and require, some debate regarding these topics. As a depositer, my decision on whether to pursue other avenues will be based on what occurs in this thread.

I think you are going to be sorely disappointed with the responses you are going to get. Many times people have asked or stated the things you have. And the responses vary from, "Good points. Amen!" to, "This game wasn't meant for poor trash, and if you can't afford to play in the big leagues, go somewhere else!" (I'm paraphrasing). As you will see in the thread I linked to above, some people fully acknowledge that this is an online casino and like it that way.

Others say it can't be compared to a casino because skill levels are involved. However, no one can pinpoint--empirically--exactly how they are involved. What I see, at this point, is a game that gets more expensive as you progress rather than the other way around. No one has really been able to convince me otherwise, except for statements like needing to play 6 - 12 hours a day to cut losses with globals and HoFs. For those of us with day jobs, that is not feasible. So one is left asking if maybe this game isn't for "casual" gamers. However, I am astounded to think that playing 40 or more hours a week makes me a "casual gamer."

Many people are observing and questioning the same things you are. I listen to veterans and I hear that many of this is relatively recent. For instance, the new skilling system (requiring you to move up to more expensive equipment and mobs to keep skilling efficiently) began with version 7.4. Many veterans are saying they are getting close to a breaking point. Maybe, in spite of being 2 to 3 year veterans, they haven't made it to the top tier of the "pyramid."

Those of us who enjoy this game--the theme, the variety, the community, etc.--go through a gut-check frequently (imo), and I think a lot of us are watching (and hoping) to see if things turn around. At the same time, this is my new source of entertainment. I love the game and I play to have fun and don't worry as much as I probably should about the ped burn. The only things I refuse to do is go into my savings or go into debt to play. With those two caveats for my only deposit limits, I am admitting that MA basically has me by the short and curlies.

If you read this site: http://www.advancedgamesdesign.com/PE_eulogy.htm you'll see the same "love/hate" relationship that many of us have with PE--with many of the same concerns you have stated. And yet he keeps hitting the deposit button (though he says he's trying to cut back).

In the end, how people choose to spend their "disposable income" is seldom logical. Before Christmas, I talked to people in my department who had spent $1,500 USD for two tickets to a University level American football game (the Rose Bowl). I was told that was a good price, and some tickets were going for $1,000 each. For a football game. Three hours. They talked about some tickets to some games that can cost $1,500 each. I asked if any game was worth that much. The response was, "It depends on the game." We are talking about sitting in a stadium, watching a (American) football game, in the cold, while paying a premium for beer and hot dogs--for four hours, tops. You're saying that for the same amount, I can play PE for a year. When I talk to those football fans, the price of PE sounds reasonable. To them, I'd be nuts. And to others, we'd both be nuts. I refuse to pay $60 to $80 a month for cable, because most TV is crap. But I'll blow more than that in a weekend on some virtual ammo. It's just not logical, so I cannot give you a logical, rational, response.

Since you will get so many varied responses to these concerns that have been stated many times, I honestly don't know if your personal decision can be based on what will be written here. Fundamentally, it is a decision you will have to make on your own. And the fact that you write this here, looking for some answers--rather than taking your own word for it and quietly cashing out and uninstalling--tells me that this game has also gotten under your skin and you are hoping someone can say something to convince you that it somehow makes sense to pour in good money after bad. I, personally, cannot give you a convincing argument--but I'll probably be depositing tonight anyway.
 
Status said:
but would the US find this as gambling??? even if MA showed accountability for how the money flows?

and, im sorry, a 15$ a month game is one thing, if my kid started asking for more for a game, then id be worried. If you give a child 15$ a month in PE, and he does good with that......hell that kid needs to be in gifted classes ;)

and this is all just my opinion :D

MA advertises the game as "real cash economy" and quotes the successes of players who have profited in this game by using news reports from outside sources on their own website, therefor implying that the average user can make money with just a small or no deposit. Sound like a lottery? Or a casino? It is the implications, along with the carefully worded publicity that has made me question the legality and "morality" of this game. When it comes to underage users, isn't that the prime target for video games of all types? But how many others give you the opportunity to make $9,000 dollars in one Hall of Fame global?
 
Luvly Luv said:
I am sorry, but it is marketed as entertainment, and I am sure that many users have spent their savings etc., on this game. At that point "entertainment" doesn't apply anymore, and gambling does. Online casino's are advertised as such, and this just seems to be a way to avoid having that disclaimer.
Kids spend their pocket money at game arcades, some even play those games which give out tickets, collect 10 cash it in you get a cheap prize, collect 100 you get a better cheap prize, collect 1000 you get an even better cheap prize, ect. ect. The point is a kid can send alot of coins through those machines, so do you conside that gambling too, most people see it as entertainment.
 
Luvly Luv said:
MA advertises the game as "real cash economy" and quotes the successes of players who have profited in this game by using news reports from outside sources on their own website, therefor implying that the average user can make money with just a small or no deposit. Sound like a lottery? Or a casino? It is the implications, along with the carefully worded publicity that has made me question the legality and "morality" of this game. When it comes to underage users, isn't that the prime target for video games of all types? But how many others give you the opportunity to make $9,000 dollars in one Hall of Fame global?

When you see what the avarage age is in PE, youd be suprised I think. Its around 22 or so according to our polls iirc. It is the real cash economy and the more challange in this game that makes more mature people stay and play and younger people usually disappears as they dont have the patience to make the challange in it.
As long as it involves real money, there will be people thinking it is a casino or lottery, but as I stated before, here you dont have to pay to play and you have a somewhat control over your odds.

Found the age-poll link: https://www.planetcalypsoforum.com/forums/showthread.php?t=9441 only 9.54% of the users who had answered are under 18. Quite different from usual MMO´s like WoW ey? ;)
 
Hrm... I guess I shouldn't be surprised that this has degenerated into the emotional appeal of "We have to protect the children!" Considering that the original post included this gem:

If this is in fact gambling, shouldn't a warning be posted like on-line gambling sites? Shouldn't an age verification be required so as not to take advantage of young people who are not yet capable of making sound judgements financially? Or do you, the users, condone the exploitation of youths? (emphasis mine)

Lovely... you either agree that this is gambling and that certain controls be slapped on it, or you support the exploitation of children. Wow, awesome.

They call that the "fallacy of the false dilemma," by the way.

And the more I think about this thread, the more it begins to seem like long-winded trolling.

Much loot,
Zim
 
Zim said:
Hrm... I guess I shouldn't be surprised that this has degenerated into the emotional appeal of "We have to protect the children!" Considering that the original post included this gem:



Lovely... you either agree that this is gambling and that certain controls be slapped on it, or you support the exploitation of children. Wow, awesome.

They call that the "fallacy of the false dilemma," by the way.

And the more I think about this thread, the more it begins to seem like long-winded trolling.

Much loot,
Zim

Ok, lets take this one step further in regards to my initial post. I mentioned that the possibility of a "pyramid scheme" exists in Project Entropia, where a few are taking advantage of the deposits of the many. Here are the reasons why I raise that:

Landowners can and often do tax loots and claims found on their land.
A. Landowners do not create their own self generating loot or claim pool, MindArk does. Therefor, for a fee, they have the ability to step in and make ped off of MindArk's creation, without anything more than the initial price of the land. Sure, if they want to attract continued hunting/mining, they can increase the attraction of the land with tougher mobs etc.

B. A 13 year old child who has played WoW probably does not have the economic sense of a 22 year old, probably has not actually earned the money deposited, and therefor is easily taken advantage of and quickly loses all their money deposited.

It is not hard to take the leap that the landowners eventually prosper, along with MindArk, from the one and two time deposit avatars who then leave. Of the 350,000 registered accounts, how many fall into this category? I would imagine at least several thousand (but can not prove that since there is no transparency in the game).

When Project Entropia first offered Land Ownership, this game (in my opine) fell into the classic definition of a pyramid scheme.
 
Status
Back
Top