A small questions, about eco of weapons.

RAD-X

Young
Joined
Oct 27, 2010
Posts
14
Hello.

I was wondering what kind of weapon is more economical, p5/kors h400+104 or apis + dante?

I took an experiment.

Shooted out 100 ped with kors h400 + 104. The all cost of weapon and amp was around 140 ped.
Shooted out 100 ped with apis + dante. The all cost was around 150 ped.

So conclusion is:

~Cost of apis + dante is 120% (around) of kors h400 + 104.

So kors h400 is cheaper? I dont think so...


I took information from entropia tool site (weapons compare).
Apis + dante makes around 180% more average dmg, than kors + 104.

So question:

If mob cost me 2 ped with kors h400 +104. I shoot 1000 ped, killing 500 mobs. Cost of it is 1400 ped.
Then i shoot the same 1000 ped from apis + dante, killing around 900(more or less 180%) mobs with cost 1500 ped.
So 100 ped more is giving me much more chance to get loot(global), from mob, also it gives me much more normal loot. Avoid regeneration, and other costs.(in fact lower decay of armor and fap).

Am I right or there is some mistake i didnt notice?
 
damage per second x regen mobs
 
damage per second x regen mobs

Lets see mob without regen with 500 hp... Doesnt matter what kind of mob, just with no regeneration. With high regen, like spiders, eco doesnt matter so much, as you have to have firepower to low his regen, otherwise it cost you much,MUCH more, than it should.


I know about regeneration, thats why i wont shoot big feffs with kors + 104, or spiders, or frescquda(for example).
 
You just need to look at the damage per PEC and damage per Sec,
so with H400 @ 112% and Apis @ 127% :

Korss H400 (L) / Omegaton A104
Damage per PEC: 2.931
Damage per Sec: 33.612

GeoTrek LP485 Apis (L) / Fi/Ra/Co Dante
Damage per PEC: 2.828
Damage per Sec: 59.443

So the H400 is more eco by 3.7% unless you are doing big regen MOBs.
 
Back
Top