There was a logical reason for this considering the storyline they used.
YOU set off a 200+kiloton explosion by a multi-million metric ton device slammed into a planet at 3/4 light speed, and tell me how it DOESN'T end up causing catastrophic tetonic plate shifting
.
And you see this giving MA the right to screw around with that which they no longer own ?
Come on seriously
That would be like me publishing some form of fiction in the public arena how there are magical creatures running aorund the streets scavenging for building materials and mechanical parts in Sweden and that I am one of these creatures ...
Then going off to Jans' , Marcos' and other directors of the board in the MindGroup of companies and taking parts off their vehicles and away from their gardens & house externally and internally while remodeling various aspects of these assets they own in the process and saying that the story published gave me the right to do it, even though I do not own their houses or their cars
Fine if they remodel anything they own on Calypso, but that which they have sold off to another party, they need to follow an ethics policy to ensure 'Duty of Care' is taken not to effect that which was sold off 'as it was' when it was sold or as close as is feasibly possible without agreed consent.
Not willy nilly changing things as they please without consent of the owning party.
This is where they have literally killed and mutilated confidence in the entire rce concept with respect to 'virtual assets'
sold by them and
owned by others maintained on their backend systems.
People may argue, you bought the rights to.
Correct, the rights to how it was before, not what there remains now after being mutilated without consent.
ie. It is no longer what they purchased and invested their money, time and effort into promoting and operating as a RCE business venture.
The law as determined by a judge would see what they have done exactly as how they would see me publishing the above example in the public arena and then going off to do what I detailed in the example.
Besides the point, please allow FPC (inc MA) the opportunity to fix what they so royal screwed up on first. They are making many reversions back to how things were after realising this epic oopsie.
It is just a matter of manpower holding them up to get this all back to an ethically acceptable state. I do not personally feel waving around the big legalities hammer is really necessary.