I'm only half sarcastic - but to come here with a little uber character and be miffed because someone called you an exploiter is not ok. You know what you do and what you did. Don't do stuff if you can't take a beating for it, even if verbal and no banhammer.
I think what you all mean is 'Thanks Centech!'.. 'Good job Centech!'...
I think that the oldtimers know better and know what's an exploit when they see one.
I suggest banning the lot who exploited it and who played long enough to know that nothing is free - say longer than a few months.
Kids in their 40s in this game have no respect for the game
Seriously - the only time anything is not abused is if someone knows about it and for some reason can't use the exploit. I also vote to delete the users who autoclicked before it was kosher and delete anything they crafted and all wealth generated - delete those who spent a year or four autoclicking NPCs with scanners, delete those who used cheats and tweaks and twists to gain an edge.
No, seriously. Delete the bastards.
I'm only half sarcastic - but to come here with a little uber character and be miffed because someone called you an exploiter is not ok. You know what you do and what you did. Don't do stuff if you can't take a beating for it, even if verbal and no banhammer.
OR, those non-adjusted attributes came from a different mission that MA did not perform the roll-back on, yet.
Yes, support cases are sent in and MA is being alerted to the oversight.
But you just go right ahead and ASSume the worst.
I think that the oldtimers know better and know what's an exploit when they see one.
I'm only half sarcastic - but to come here with a little uber character and be miffed because someone called you an exploiter is not ok. You know what you do and what you did.
Some of the old-timers who wanted MA to burn and ban those exploit users are the same ones who thought this exploit was OK.
Ain't hypocrisy a funny thing?
Could be a case of If you can't beat them, join them?
Could be a case of If you can't beat them, join them?
Mmm, doesn't seem likely the amount of attributes were obtained through other missions as it was too large of a gain.
But do forgive me for being a skeptic, JC. It's not like there would have been anything in the past to warrant any assumptions of favortism, eh?
I mean how could MA "oversee" these certain (popular?) players, yet "happen to notice" all those "not so popular" ones?
I dunno, Chief....Kinda makes me wonder....Lots of coincidental oversights seem to happen to certain people a lot: But you'll only notice if you're being observant. (Sort of like noticing the same item - with same stats - repetitively being listed in auction by two different people at incrementaly higher M/U)