Kuber please dont tell me you think that Mindark is doing the 'balancing' one by one when it comes to adding items to the game. If that would be the case i would be seriously scared.
I am quite sure that the number of motherships mindark is going to release is not balanced to the current date but with years of space development still to come in mind.
I am not complaining about the total number, i just dislike the way of keeping that number unknown and not keeping to the own schedule. And this is a schedule they would be easily able to keep, not like some other development schedules.
I do, actually. First off, let's remember that we're talking about unlimited mothership deeds and not a fap or rifle. I suspect the balancing routine might be a bit different for a roaming land area than a planetside user object.
And there are some caveats to my beliefs on this. If they are "balancing" by predicting out in the future how many motherships will be needed based on, say, marketing campaigns by planet partners which haven't occurred yet, then they are complete buffoons and this notion of "balance" is just a joke anyway. My concept of balancing does require them to be managing items based on how many current active users or potential users (like created, but dormant accounts) are in the system, and not "speculative users" based on hazy future efforts. In this case, the possibility of added "speculative users" ought to be what those (L) mothership BP drops are for.
But I'm also not sure how active all of the motherships have been. And my expectation of a true "balancing" system involves not only a specific number of ships, but how many of those ships are operating as well. If there's a mothership that's been docked in orbit and hasn't moved yet since the beginning of space, should that count as part of an active balance?
Obviously if the long-term plan was to have unlimited AND limited motherships, then in terms of "balance" there's probably some gray area there where an extra number of unL motherships over the "balance" limit can be equalized by less (L) motherships in the verse, or fewer unlimited motherships could be balanced by more (L) motherships.
I'm fascinated by the concept of how this balancing works, and how much scrutiny over records and historical logs it takes to manage all this stuff, but my faith in the game has to assume that there is a true balancing process, and that it isn't necessarily a completely mathematical routine, and does require changes, monitoring of how those changes flow out into the system, followed by more changes.
Is it possible the Ark Royal was just a brazen call for more cash? Sure. But I don't think we have enough data to determine this fact. We don't have their original lists. And I don't think their original announcement of "one per 24 hours" means that once 24 hours goes by without a ship on the auction, that this means definitively that there will be no more unlimited motherships ever released.
Just my thoughts. Your mileage may vary.
Personally I think the value of these motherships has jumped tremendously now that the motherships and privateers now have the "safe stackables through lootable PVP" exploit. Meanwhile, the ability of small fighter pilots to protect stackables through lootable PVP has been nerfed and removed from the game. So while some believe the value of motherships is being "diluted", in reality they may be becoming even more valuable...