- Joined
- Oct 10, 2015
- Posts
- 2,265
Okay so hunting profession got lots of info on how the mechanics work. i think thats a good thing. but now id like to know one thing about mining and i hope that MA will clear this up.
when extracting a claim, does the decay from the extractor go right into MAs pocket, back into the loot pool with a % to MA or is it somehow calculated into future claims, as it seems to be the case in hunting with decay? cos right now theres basically only a very small amount of extractors that should be used at all... the tt one, the adj, imp and mod and maybe the rockripper goldrush and M05 SGA edition. but thats about it.
when looking at lyst like claims (1 pec per stone) you lose about 4% in claims value with the RE-105 for example. opposed to only roughly 1% with tt extractor. and 3% is kinda a huge amount so theres no really any motivation to use bigger extractor than the tt one unless you can afford to spend 2k peds+ to obtain one of the mentioned ones. while only the adj and imp excav are more eco than the tt one. i think that gap is by far too huge and there should be something done about it.
now i was thinking i could use for example an RE-103 and put some enhancer on it to make it worthwhile. and then i was checking which enhancers are available and there are only speed enhancers... why? those are the most useless ones when you dont want to throw money away. why are there no efficiency, or eco enhancers? those might mix it up a bit and might make other excavators a little better and also create a new demand for resources for tiering medium excavators and for making those enhancers. i hope there will be done something about it or we get some clearing up on what is done with extractor decay.
when extracting a claim, does the decay from the extractor go right into MAs pocket, back into the loot pool with a % to MA or is it somehow calculated into future claims, as it seems to be the case in hunting with decay? cos right now theres basically only a very small amount of extractors that should be used at all... the tt one, the adj, imp and mod and maybe the rockripper goldrush and M05 SGA edition. but thats about it.
when looking at lyst like claims (1 pec per stone) you lose about 4% in claims value with the RE-105 for example. opposed to only roughly 1% with tt extractor. and 3% is kinda a huge amount so theres no really any motivation to use bigger extractor than the tt one unless you can afford to spend 2k peds+ to obtain one of the mentioned ones. while only the adj and imp excav are more eco than the tt one. i think that gap is by far too huge and there should be something done about it.
now i was thinking i could use for example an RE-103 and put some enhancer on it to make it worthwhile. and then i was checking which enhancers are available and there are only speed enhancers... why? those are the most useless ones when you dont want to throw money away. why are there no efficiency, or eco enhancers? those might mix it up a bit and might make other excavators a little better and also create a new demand for resources for tiering medium excavators and for making those enhancers. i hope there will be done something about it or we get some clearing up on what is done with extractor decay.