girtsn
Slayer
- Joined
- Dec 7, 2005
- Posts
- 8,698
- Location
- Belgium
- Society
- Freelancer
- Avatar Name
- Girts Smilgs Niedra
There still has not been a 100% clear message if the return of someone hunting/mining on LA with tax X% would be normal return minus X%.
If it is indeed so, would it not make more sense that LAs would have the same returns as outside LA hunting, or a small difference? The current 4% set on most LAs is just not justifiable with the "normal" 95% tt return.
E.g. if the LA owner chooses a low tax rate like 3%, the 3% would come out of MA's / planet partners share not out of the players returns. If they chose to do more than 3%, then the added surplus is deducted from loot.
This would make LAs more attractive to users vs. nonLA which the owners currently have to offset by manually paying taxes back to users.
If it is indeed so, would it not make more sense that LAs would have the same returns as outside LA hunting, or a small difference? The current 4% set on most LAs is just not justifiable with the "normal" 95% tt return.
E.g. if the LA owner chooses a low tax rate like 3%, the 3% would come out of MA's / planet partners share not out of the players returns. If they chose to do more than 3%, then the added surplus is deducted from loot.
This would make LAs more attractive to users vs. nonLA which the owners currently have to offset by manually paying taxes back to users.