- Joined
- Oct 25, 2007
- Posts
- 521
The UL Boar set has 3100 durability but the new Boar L has 13100 durability. Which is more economical if I burn lot of PED on Boar armor?
You can calculate this almost exactly, actually.
Average decay per hour/day/week/month X Time X MU of Armor
If boar UL costs around +1k MU, and L costs 105% (25 ped per full suit), it would take 40 entire suits before you lost money by using L instead of UL.
You can calculate this almost exactly, actually.
Average decay per hour/day/week/month X Time X MU of Armor
If boar UL costs around +1k MU, and L costs 105% (25 ped per full suit), it would take 40 entire suits before you lost money by using L instead of UL.
Use (L) armor while <130% indefinitely. The end.
yeah i was probably thinking of higher end armors when i said that (sup vs sup(L) for example the value factor is 135% vs atrox stalker)how do you arrive at this? the infomation about durability on the wiki suggests a 16% difference, and what else improves the economy of limited? i'd wonder if the practical difference is even that large, since the L armour retains full protection, so higher cost, than unL which decreases as the protection drops with decay.