D
Deleted member 58836
Guest
Do you think the algorithm includes Average Markup, be it day, week, month, year or decade?
Do you have recent evidence for or against this?
Do you have recent evidence for or against this?
Do you think the algorithm includes Average Markup, be it day, week, month, year or decade?
Do you have recent evidence for or against this?
The loot system never accounts for markup. Not on markup spent on things like enhancers or limited weapons, nor on markup gained from loot such as oils, items and ESI etc, markup values are just transactions between players. It is always TT in vs TT out.
Was thinking of this quote before I opened the thread...That´s all.
I don’t think so. When doing turret testing any skill gains made no difference to shrapnel return.Are skills considered part of the loot algorithm?
Yep, and the weather temperature aswellIm preety sure MU is calculated in loot algorythm.
Yep and follow those perception skill gains.. that’s where the loot isYep, and the weather temperature aswell
If it was we would not have so many people complaining about 50% returnsIm preety sure MU is calculated in loot algorythm.
I'm pretty sure it's not.Im preety sure MU is calculated in loot algorythm.
I am sorry i wrote enhancer instead of Tier comp, my bad.you are confusing cause with effect
MU is generated by the request by crafters to get their loss back in crafting enhancers
as an example my enhancer crafting averages over 20.000 click at 208%
that includes about 150% MU on Pyrite, 110% on output amlifiers and 42% success in crafting
if i sell under 208% i am average loosing so i ask 220.. if no one buy i ask 210.. lower i rpefer to use my enhancers.
same for every craft....
crafters use ORE ENM and OILS (amoung orhers)
look last days, many miners are not mining for low markup ores, so lysterium rose and iron rose,
and due to MA orders also basioc leather extractors rose in mu
you are perceiving the effect and naming it the cause. sorry. try to change reasining backward
and you see..
like per (L) weapons dropped... a 108% ISIS is same as a 115% armatrix so it is is under 108 ppl buy isis otherwise buy armatrix (personal taste apart)
(UL items follow different logics)
Do you think the algorithm includes Average Markup, be it day, week, month, year or decade?
Do you have recent evidence for or against this?
it is excluded by ALL MA official statements
who consider MU is in fact supporting a conspiration theory.
loot algorithm is TT in ----> TT out (and it is less than 100%
the MU if any accounts to making more peds than decay and ammo
Has it been considered that drop rates (part of loot algo) use avg markup as part of the calculation?
I'm sure they manipulate the number of drops which in turn causes the MU to fluctuate. So, I can see this being the cause of your concern. MA has changed drop rates lots. And they don't seem to put much effort into managing out-of-control MU on certain items. This is the game though and MA has been able to keep most of the EU economy engine secret for all this time. I think they change it everytime more than a few figure it out. Eventually they will run out of tricks though, just like JPM in RL.
Example rl
Go try sell dirt to someone
Noone need dirt since theyr able to collect it by theyr self.