Konve
Marauder
- Joined
- Feb 28, 2005
- Posts
- 6,068
- Avatar Name
- David Konve Williams
I think if you take 100 players that deposit money into game and have them cycle their winnings you would find EU took prolly 30% of the cash total everyone put in but that 70% left over is continually cycled amongst players. EU never would get any more. They make 30% of deposit value only. Players could play a long time, eventually there would be just one player with the 70% using this model but EU did not get it all.
Firstly of all, I have watched this game for nearly eight years. From experience, I say you're utterly wrong. But that's just my opinion.
Secondly, from a statistical point of view, in order for that to be true it would mean some avatars are born lucky (because if everyone is equally lucky, in the end everyone would share the 70 %). Since that implies a rigged game, I don't think MA would dare make such an approach. Because it would be illegal in so many ways.