I doubt that.
Even if there were less on the market, there is still the problem of the usefullness.
OA101 is a "noob" amp, efficiency is rated with 2.5 and average return with it is not 10% higher.
Why should one pay 110% MU for it if you could get an OA104 for 110% MU?
Hi WoenK.. long time no talk
I have to admit that I do not understand the efficiency and 10% return for 101 so I apologize for my stupidity
I will have to disagree with you completely though on: a) 101 being a "noob" amp, b) why pay the 110% MU for 101 vs 104
Here is how it goes on 100 drops for both amps at 110% MU:
OA-104: Bombs TT 100 PED, amp TT 300 PED, amp MU 30 PED => MU as % of TT spent => 30 / (100+300) = 7.5%
OA-101: Bombs TT 100 PED, amp TT 50 PED, amp MU 5 PED => MU as % of TT spent => 5 / (100+50) = 3.3%
104 basically is way more expensive to use than 101 at the same MU. Given that ore sizes are linked directly to the TT value consumed by the amp, you get the following surprising numbers for a lot of people.
With an average 90% TT return on the long run, and a hypothetical consistent MU on your ores of 120%, one will
always break even in mining by paying the following MUs.
OA-104: 110%
OA-101: 123%
exactly.. one that cares about % return, should be indifferent financially paying 123% MU on 101 vs 110% on 104. All of sudden the 110% that I mentioned for 101s doesn't look too bad, right?
Furthermore, there are more reasons why use 101s: a) Some rare ores can be found regularly only with small amps, b) Lots of players don't have an endless budget to risk as it was already mentioned.
101 is anything but a noob amp basically. It's the single most profitable crafted L attachment in EU in my opinion.
Ofc people love to risk/gamble but that we knew already.. bigger guns, bigger mobs, bigger armor, bigger amps, me clicking 101s and so forth