L
LokiDarkStar
Guest
AkiranBlade
Sir,
I really don’t understand the first part of your post. I did not attack anyone that did not attack me first. Yes, I used the term ‘idiot’ but their post proved to me that it seemed a correct response. If I’m not attacked, then guess what, I don’t attack back. It seemed to me that they were not addressing the message but the messenger.
I do suggest you read once again their post and perhaps you will then understand why I responded as I did.
I do agree with the main part of your post. If someone wished to spend whatever amount of money in whatever means is no concern of mine.
However, if I see what appears to me to be cheating, I feel it is correct for me to report this behavior to MA and also, inform other player of that is happening. After all, in the last message from MA, not reporting is also a ‘sin’.
Do I have ‘Proof’, of course not, no one could. Again, that is my issue, how can anyone expect me to have proof? I’m not an employee of MA, I see a behavior, and I report that behavior and rely on MA to check their logs to see if the behavior I observed is what in fact happened.
I observed two players, two uber players ‘hiding’ in trees, a FAP in their hands, many, many bots shooting them, they do not respond to the bots or my questions for over an hour. I must assume that something is not ‘right’
That is what I reported…, yes I consider what I saw cheating. But, if the logs of MA, if they decide to even look into the support request, show that they were in fact on auto click, then one would assume that MA needs to make a decision, are auto clinker OK or not.
I have nothing against the players I observed, but I do wish to know if this behavior is acceptable. If so, then I will do the same to see if it is cheaper than hunting.
In addition, I am concerned about the ‘hate mail’ I saw from ‘ubers’ concerning a ‘breaking of rules’ dealing with the ‘spider trap’, yet in a situation that is possibly another example of ‘breaking of rules’, the self same hubers attack me for reporting it.
DS…
Sir,
I really don’t understand the first part of your post. I did not attack anyone that did not attack me first. Yes, I used the term ‘idiot’ but their post proved to me that it seemed a correct response. If I’m not attacked, then guess what, I don’t attack back. It seemed to me that they were not addressing the message but the messenger.
I do suggest you read once again their post and perhaps you will then understand why I responded as I did.
I do agree with the main part of your post. If someone wished to spend whatever amount of money in whatever means is no concern of mine.
However, if I see what appears to me to be cheating, I feel it is correct for me to report this behavior to MA and also, inform other player of that is happening. After all, in the last message from MA, not reporting is also a ‘sin’.
Do I have ‘Proof’, of course not, no one could. Again, that is my issue, how can anyone expect me to have proof? I’m not an employee of MA, I see a behavior, and I report that behavior and rely on MA to check their logs to see if the behavior I observed is what in fact happened.
I observed two players, two uber players ‘hiding’ in trees, a FAP in their hands, many, many bots shooting them, they do not respond to the bots or my questions for over an hour. I must assume that something is not ‘right’
That is what I reported…, yes I consider what I saw cheating. But, if the logs of MA, if they decide to even look into the support request, show that they were in fact on auto click, then one would assume that MA needs to make a decision, are auto clinker OK or not.
I have nothing against the players I observed, but I do wish to know if this behavior is acceptable. If so, then I will do the same to see if it is cheaper than hunting.
In addition, I am concerned about the ‘hate mail’ I saw from ‘ubers’ concerning a ‘breaking of rules’ dealing with the ‘spider trap’, yet in a situation that is possibly another example of ‘breaking of rules’, the self same hubers attack me for reporting it.
DS…