Kerham
Elite
- Joined
- Sep 6, 2006
- Posts
- 4,892
- Location
- to the moon and back
- Society
- Project Y
- Avatar Name
- Kerawan Kerham Maddahy
Where do the 2000+ TT value items come from then?
Why those things must have 2k+ TT? Why them must have 50% minimum condition? Why Isis HL12 can't have minimum tt of 3%?
MindArk did, MindArk can undo.
Uberloots don't exist ingame because ul SIB had necessary high TT, but inverse, ul SIB were designed with high TT in order to create the uberloots.
And let me say you, it was first Mod Merc, than ul X5. And Entropia was working fine thank you without SIB and we players weren't loosing our money too bad for using "uneco unmaximized weapons at too low levels".
But those weapons had the detrimental of having low decay so MA decided is not good.
Same goes for mobs, it was not the will of God that Feffoids suddenly needed regen and higher hp, and MA had to obey. MA designed them to have increase regen and hp, in order to create bigger risk on same quantity of PED consumed vs. old Fefs, so more PED needed to be circulated, more depositing needed etc.
Same MindArk was unhappy with old mining system which had deposits with lower value, hence more of them, so instead of, for example, the old "average" of 3 peds they implemented new "average" with 7 peds. So instead of finding two old average deposits, so higher chance of break even, now you need to hit only one, so higher chance not to.
Same MindArk was unhappy with old mining finders and extractors with uber low decay so they introduced first OF series than Ziplex. And we'll see even more decaying items in future.
Same goes for uber faps not lootable anymore, but MA took care to implement vivo and hedok BS with their fap-5 like speed in order to be sure you're hit more often by mob.
Same MA nerfed agility so we run slower so again we're hit more often by mob.
And so many others. The game was made in this high risk environment by its creators, because so they intended. Is a very simple mechanism: player will tend to keep his deposit limits monthly so if you reduce his chances of breaking even/make him spend more for same activity, chances are he'll be more prone to make next month deposit.
But this whole high risk doesn't have to exist, is not a fatality, an imuable act of fate. Is just MA's will.