Unfortunately, there is no chance I will open an account with Facebook if that is required to participate in the voting (let aside the lack of choices, which is another subject). There are several reasons for this, and these reasons exist not only since yesterday. Just the latest nail in the coffin, pertaining but not restricted to my home country:
http://pamelageller.com/2016/02/mar...s-inspiring-u-s-should-follow-their-lead.html
If there are different, more steadfast venues for casting one's opinion in this matter, I like to learn about them. I will support a "President of Virtual Reality" in any name, shape, form of organisation or whatever, who spearheads resistance against the sprawling encroachment on free speech everywhere human minds gather. I have already experienced the idea of "thought crime" being forced into another virtual world I liked to visit earlier, Second Life. Hence there is good evidence that the conception of a representative and organisation spanning across the multitude of non-physical realms is needed and appearing just in time. Not least because the enemy is doing just that already! Practical obstacles exist that await ideas for solution still, but this is no grounds for ridicule i.m.o.
All this is not about a game. If it was, such efforts in politics would not be necessary, even be ridiculous. Those who created this initiative are aware of this, and deserve credit for their vision. Those who see nothing but a publicity stunt for Mr. Neverdie are missing the point. Our game(s) is(are) just the backdrop for our gathering. The final warning of a wise man, spoken long before the extent of current technology's reach into our privacy was thought possible despite his already drastic visions, is therefore more valid than ever:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JXm5hklbBsA (at 1:30 is the money quote)
Note to whom it may concern: I am fully aware of the potential for controversy in the offered viewpoints especially through hyperlinks. Objections are absolutely welcome (I seldom learn something from people I agree with), but they can only be raised if the subject is known to exist out there, and able to be shown in the context where you want to point it out. I am not going through life with every rule book clogging up space in my head nor do I double check every utterance with what some major or minor authority finds permissible. However, due to experience, I am henceforth taking measures against the risk of sudden disappearance of such contributions which have cost me energy to produce, beginning with but not restricted to comprehensive documentation and backup for the purpose of re-publishing should the need arise. I will not allow being chopped off at the knees one more time. I recommend everyone who cares do likewise. Oh, the irony.