LadyMichelle
Mature
- Joined
- Jun 3, 2015
- Posts
- 28
- Avatar Name
- Michelle LadyMichelle Clark
The rep was for supporting Vixens on Calypso. I think we should be able to spawn them there as well.
Just one funny fact: i have received 4 neg reps for my previous posts here (from ppl all supporting cyborgs/monsters with visual appearance of a woman being tameable) and ALL 4 are men who are playing female avatar... Creeepy..
Good heavens! This thread has hit a new level of incoherency! I don't know whether to be bemused or dumbfounded at some of this bickering. Such a shame as there were some well made points previously, now it seems the re-rinses of previous points have lapsed, and we are left with the dredging up of some quite disconcerting ideas. Prime example of what was pointed out earlier in terms of impressibility.
I do.There was this other 3D environment (don't mentioning names to not get deleted). Ppl could create content, own avatars and own game logic. For way too long there were no rules, everything was allowed. All big companies (Ford, NBC, Fox News, name it) were there and had their own island.
And guess what: no rules, so of course ppl programmed pedo stuff. Players could act as kids and babies and get paid to be abused by other avatars. Yes, it was all pixels. Was it OK? No.
Result: all big companies left this "game", because they created rules way too late.
Do you want this to happen to Entropia? I don't.
Well. We're not SL. Let's be realistic, we're below radar, nobody knows we even exist. Apples and Oranges.
What we need right now is a little bit of controversy.
So, what could we try? Maybe "Tamable female android pets whipped into slavery"? Oh wait, we already have that.
I do.
I mean, it would be good for the business to have Ford, NBC, fox News and Name It - all here, each with their entire separate planet.
Well. We're not SL. Let's be realistic, we're below radar, nobody knows we even exist. Apples and Oranges.
What we need right now is a little bit of controversy.
So, what could we try? Maybe "Tamable female android pets whipped into slavery"? Oh wait, we already have that. If we restrict it to one planet only or not might be a very important question for us, insiders. It doesn't mean anything to the ppl out there who know nothing about EU. What's done is already done.
So u saying it will be a disaster of unbelievable magnitude? I think you're an optimist...
But in case your right and we get some media coverage, that would be a good thing. If we really lucky and manage to increase our playerbase, say, tenfold at least... That's not so hard actually.
Suppose we lose half of the potential customers because of the controversy, well, then we increase the playerbase only 5 times. And get rid of all this rigid hypocrite uncool folks we don't want to see here anyway. Win/win.
After that, yes i agree, we might have to slow down a bit. Maybe take a step back n look at the big picture figure out our next steps. We'll cross that brige when we come to it.
Why should Entropia continue to be below the radar? Why on earth are MA wasting time and money on advertising, development and Compets if the plan is to keep us as dirty seedy underworld?
I guess I just have hope for the universe, and hate to see it being catapulted backwards in this way.
One was missing. Fixt.Why did you create and play with female ava?
- im a woman
- im a pervert and doing with my female slave ava whatever i want
- im a gay
- scaming purposes
- to piss off Dan
i don't think it would be good for eu community if we had an influx of ppl coming here because they read and heard about a controversial robot half naked amusement pet girl and join because of that...
Players could act as kids and babies and get paid to be abused by other avatars. Yes, it was all pixels. Was it OK? No.
Result: all big companies left this "game", because they created rules way too late.
Do you want this to happen to Entropia? I don't.
I do.
I mean, it would be good for the business to have Ford, NBC, fox News and Name It - all here, each with their entire separate planet.
But in case your right and we get some media coverage, that would be a good thing. If we really lucky and manage to increase our playerbase, say, tenfold at least... That's not so hard actually.
Suppose we lose half of the potential customers because of the controversy, well, then we increase the playerbase only 5 times. And get rid of all this rigid hypocrite uncool folks we don't want to see here anyway. Win/win.
Why should Entropia continue to be below the radar? Why on earth are MA wasting time and money on advertising, development and Compets if the plan is to keep us as dirty seedy underworld?
I guess I just have hope for the universe, and hate to see it being catapulted backwards in this way.
U seem to think ND made tamable vixens behind MA's back?... and luckily MA sees it different too.
U seem to think ND made tamable vixens behind MA's back?
This whole argument of yours that you keep hammering on our heads over and over again is based on that assumption, and it's wrong. MA has known about this long before it was implemented, long before any of us (players) knew about it.
So there, step down from this soapbox and let MA speak for themselves...
K in your opinion would it be OK if there was a game where you could molest robot or vampire kids that look like humans? If the answer is no, why should it be any different for women?
This all could be fixed very easily with change of appearance so no one right minded could compare these mobs with women, until that it is indeed walking on very thin line.
There was this other 3D environment (don't mentioning names to not get deleted). Ppl could create content, own avatars and own game logic. For way too long there were no rules, everything was allowed. All big companies (Ford, NBC, Fox News, name it) were there and had their own island.
And guess what: no rules, so of course ppl programmed pedo stuff. Players could act as kids and babies and get paid to be abused by other avatars. Yes, it was all pixels. Was it OK? No.
Result: all big companies left this "game", because they created rules way too late.
Do you want this to happen to Entropia? I don't.
If you like to have a woman as pet/slave (yes, it's a robotblabla), just fly to Rocktropia. You can do that there and also find a lot friends there. What is your problem?
It was the RT community who has asked for vixen pets ever since taming has come back in the game. I do not know if it was always in pipeline to bring them in or not. As a business ND listened to his customers and gave them what they want. There was not talk about them being "sex slaves" people just liked this mob and wanted for them self's. I have been on RT since the start and it has always been asked when will BP drop so players can dress like the vixens and humanoids on RT. Just because you are not happy with them it don't mean a lot of others are not happy.
So the RT community asked for them so let the RT community keep them ....on their planet.
tacosmashed
Players on ALL planets want them.
If you like to have a woman as pet/slave (yes, it's a robotblabla), just fly to Rocktropia. You can do that there and also find a lot friends there. What is your problem?
He is saying this to show it was a player requested thing, not purely invented by ND.
Players on ALL planets want them.
Much more player do than the ones that don't.
SO because you and a few others are intimidated by them or read things into them that are not there, why cant we have them everywhere? SIlly!!!
This is a claim you cannot prove. E.g. in the case of the shrinking of ancient strong pets, evidence even speaks against it. The vixen pet, like many controversial things in the world, has many fans who won't speak up publicly or even care to vote. Loud is always ever the opposition first. Public image about nearly everything is skewed this way. Cunning polititians are aware and know how to use this to manipulate.This is a good example of a good business decision by MA: they know what player really want in this game and don't listen to a few ppl who shout out loud.
This is a claim you cannot prove. E.g. in the case of the shrinking of ancient strong pets, evidence even speaks against it. The vixen pet, like many controversial things in the world, has many fans who won't speak up publicly or even care to vote.
In total the whole topic is still about the rant of people who do not respect the wish of planet partners. Plus many of them call others nazis, taliban-lovers etc. So yes, the tone of this discussion is a little out of hands.
.
Shud PP and MA respect wishes of their customers too?
I believe it, if that's your trade. I had some on my wishlist, but now they are useless and you lose business. I would have used them for the exact purpose why pk'ers hate them, namely as a shield when venturing into pvp zones because otherwise I would have no means of mitigation whatsoever which I find deeply unfair. But the pk'ers demand "respect" in the form that you expose yourself willingly. A discussion about it happened here just recently, so it looks as if MA indeed listened to a few but very loud voices, and the wrong ones i.m.o. I dislike seeing that repeated.I am harmed very hard from the Ancient Strong pets change (lvl 40+ tamer, so I have quite some in storage), I lose a lot more PEDs only on this than the Vixen tamers.
So true. Yet it's tragic when skewed perception leads to decisions which pacify a few loud ones at the expense of the many silent ones. We all know what becomes of a child if parents give it candy any time it screams.It's impossible to please all.