Audrey Cheerful
Elite
- Joined
- Feb 18, 2010
- Posts
- 2,585
- Location
- Planet Calypso
- Avatar Name
- Audrey Cheery Cheerful
In MaryJane case, support insta locked the "lucky" buyer
That's fucking criminal!
In MaryJane case, support insta locked the "lucky" buyer
Hello dear forum,
Leta get things clear before this shitstorm gone too far:
1. Both sellers sold item too cheap (do not say what is too cheap)
2. Both sellers complained in forum.
3. Both sellers wrote support.
4. Both buyers got locked for investigation.
MindArk did nothing against them.
First seller chose not to give back cld.
Other seller chosed to give back part of cld.
Ma did not forced or did any other action.
Helena sent friend irl to harass buyer, that was reason he not got it back imo.
So dont blane MindArk because they reacted same in both situations.!
//mg
In fact, Helena's buyer got perma-banned as far as I know. I don't understand the purpose of this thread.
Calm down, imho your case was badly handled from both sides.
Thats what i heard. So if he got permanent banned what happened to the CLD? The thing is do MA show fav to certain avatars or would they buckle under the chance of being dragged through court? Will they ever sort AH so this shit stops popping up again.
No offence to op...You people just don't learn do you.....This is not something that's happened today yesterday this has been happening openly for so long it's unbelievable....Of course their is favouritism of course their is no equality....This has been happening since day one time and time and time again....So if your here today crying about it there is no one to blame but yourself because you choose to let them treat you like this and abuse you by being a part of it....This whole system is corrupt and a scam.... Coincidences too many..... tooooo many
Hello dear forum,
Leta get things clear before this shitstorm gone too far:
1. Both sellers sold item too cheap (do not say what is too cheap)
2. Both sellers complained in forum.
3. Both sellers wrote support.
4. Both buyers got locked for investigation.
MindArk did nothing against them.
First seller chose not to give back cld.
Other seller chosed to give back part of cld.
Ma did not forced or did any other action.
Helena sent friend irl to harass buyer, that was reason he not got it back imo.
So dont blane MindArk because they reacted same in both situations.!
//mg
I would really like people that dont know anything stop spreading rumors and shit when they have no idea of what they are talking about.
I know you wss guyz would do and say anything if that can deserve us from entropy, but you should be careful because someday you willbe the one that may question Mindark policies.
Wirlo have not been locked after he got my cld. He got locked over 1 month after for a lot of reasons i wont talk on forum.
What is questionnable is the Mindark support answer that insta locked pitbull so pressured him and did nothing after wirlo for almost a month.
Dont start bullshitting people saying he got instalocked as well coz this is pure lie, same than the reason or bs u are talking about my own action
. .
Rumours... rumours... rumours...
Except that is fact not rumour.
What are the facts? The people who were directly involved have spoken already.
But i see it's not being taken granted by some others... So it leaves a gray area for rumours...
It's one word against the other...
. .
Rumours... rumours... rumours...
how can you possibly call "rumours" that the FACT that being locked is a kind of pressure?
Anyway the main point is also pure fact:
case 1: not insta locked
case 2 similar to case 1: insta locked
this is pure facts and cant be denied whatever bad intentioned people would say
What would happen if Pitbull had declined to give back the deeds?
What would happen if Pitbull had declined to give back the deeds?
i have no idea, and that would be speculation.
What would happen if Wirlo had been locked the same way? It is speculation also
What is not speculation is one of them got insta-locked and the other one was not, support helped mary jane but not helped me.
Venture Bros see how mature a discussion can be?
Take an example how Helena is communicating with me... Instead of you who starts Neg-repping right away...
On topic:
I believe sometimes "things" must happen before a specific reaction happens...
Example... In the past people accidentally TTed high end items... and no roll-back happened.
Then one day a UL level 5 amp was TTed and mindark changed the rule that with 1k ped fee they can do a roll back.
No offence to op...You people just don't learn do you.....This is not something that's happened today yesterday this has been happening openly for so long it's unbelievable....Of course their is favouritism of course their is no equality....This has been happening since day one time and time and time again....So if your here today crying about it there is no one to blame but yourself because you choose to let them treat you like this and abuse you by being a part of it....This whole system is corrupt and a scam.... Coincidences too many..... tooooo many
seems like some trades are more final than the others
All I see is you ignoring arguements after your point is made moot then making a personal attack instead. Yea very mature. Lmfao.
Sorry for your loss Helena and can understand why you are so frustrated with the different outcomes with more or less the same issue. What we don't know however is if in fact the 2 cases were handled in the same way and that the only difference is with the buyers in that one agreed a "deal" and the other declined. Or perhaps in one case (yours) the deeds had already been sold on and in MJ's case the deeds were still recoverable.
Whatever the truth is however i think MA need to set a firm policy on this and tell the community what it is to prevent a belief (whether with or without foundation) that there are different policies depending on the player.