Ziplex spam

They refilled the pool too much
 
Also i though ziplex always comes as a rare hof but on cyrene i cant see most of them being looted now.
Well not the first fuckup not the last one :)
 
I asked Live chat about that 2h ago and they said they will make internal note about that.
I have a feeling its a sticky note on fridge xD
 
EL shows 88 so far :)
 
index.php


Still going on. @Ludvig|MindArk

People abusing this so hard.
 
so mike , u looted a few xmas rings havent u?
as for me , i have no problem in giving the finder back to ma, if this is actualy a bug and not some sort of way to impulsionate cycle in mining.
did u offer that at any time?
 
so mike , u looted a few xmas rings havent u?
as for me , i have no problem in giving the finder back to ma, if this is actualy a bug and not some sort of way to impulsionate cycle in mining.
did u offer that at any time?

It is obvious that this is a bug. And you are still doing it. 1 minute ago. Abusing hard.
 
Resource Mayhem on the way?
 
Just my luck. Try to unlock 1 mining strongbox 1...could not execute.

Guess you have to unprotect the item before you can unlock...Doh!
 
Last edited:
Also remember that If people are looting rare items fast, Entropia Life will not be able to record all of them correctly. So the number could be significantly higher than what we see.
 
Abusing a system error... aaa I got it :mad:(n)
 
how is opening boxes abuse?

you obviously have knowledge
Well, one can argue the monria mining case. It's the same scenario. Mindark gave that individual a swift ban. But how would one know? Mindark said it was our responsibility to determine what is normal and what isn't. It's stupid.

It's a dumb system all around because they can't be bothered to code something so damn simple.

But rather fix these important things or even update this stale forum to stop the viagra chinese ads, they are busy doing version updates of colored underwear.
 
so are we about to see multiple accounts get a temp ban? or was this intended?
 
so are we about to see multiple accounts get a temp ban? or was this intended?
You mean the holiday until the next opportunity strikes?
 
Well, one can argue the monria mining case. It's the same scenario. Mindark gave that individual a swift ban. But how would one know? Mindark said it was our responsibility to determine what is normal and what isn't. It's stupid.

It's a dumb system all around because they can't be bothered to code something so damn simple.

But rather fix these important things or even update this stale forum to stop the viagra chinese ads, they are busy doing version updates of colored underwear.

It's important to keep in mind that there's (hopefully) a lot of information integrated into such adjudication conclusions that we don't see. For all we know, the subject of the other case may have been sending people PMs bragging about how they were milking the exploit, and when MindArk asked them about it, answered with verifiable lies or contradictions, such that the individual's intent to break the rule was actually established beyond reasonable doubt. That doesn't take away from your point that policy should be much less of a focus and implementing the right code much more. It's also possible that MindArk was not adequately diligent in investigating and did the "they 100% knew it was an exploit I can feel it in my bones" PCF poster larp, but either way, all we as outsiders would see in a case like this are the initial global messages and (if the player publicizes/complains about it) the suspension.

Usually (absent some special case-specific evidence), I think it's fair to assume any loot obtained performing an ordinary gameplay action is intended. Dev posts to the contrary would be one example of overriding evidence. Another example might be a blueprint producing an item other than the item in its name.
 
Look at the bright side everyone, Ziplex gonna be fucking cheap. 😂😂😂😂 Wish it was the same with guns 😂😂😂😂 so people can stop day dreaming of six figure ped prices.
 
MA screwed up, some people got rich because of it, end of story... not the first time, not the last time I'm sure

And since it still continues, looks like MA doesn't even care lol, too busy coloring the new underwear for next VU maybe. Priorities people, priorities! :D
 
Back
Top