Become a citizen of Planet Calypso!

This had to come out at 5AM for Australian players ?? (And that's just the East Coast ones. Westies are still asleep I think)

Auction empty atm, hoping for more to be released later in our day (and I dont mean at 11.55pm either!)


Today's bunch seemed to appear at around 9am Sydney time (or maybe that's yesterdays'? :D), there are still many singles after 1.5 hours being on the auction, so if you wanna buy one, you will definitely have a chance, the rush is over.

Does anyone know how many MA sells per day?
 
well, if we get 20-30 % ROI the deads will probably have a market value of at least 1000 ped so you could sell them if you want. So i would not say you must wait that long. But all depends on the future of Calypso and MA.

What is one deed worth when you grabbed a lot which is surrounded by lots that you do not own ?
What would be 9 lots worth that are 3x3 ?
20% ROI sounds for me highly optimistic and no one would sell something with that ROI unless he has to (they are surely not selling them to us because it is a great idea but because they can not find a buyer and it leaves them still in control).
I would rather wait till the next crisis strikes and the deed sell for half the price, 5-10% ROI sounds more realistic for me, especially because activity is not that high (if one takes the tracker as a kind of indicator).
 
What is one deed worth when you grabbed a lot which is surrounded by lots that you do not own ?

Would Depend what the guy that owns the other lots wants to pay for it.

(if one takes the tracker as a kind of indicator).


the tracker is a very poor indicatator for a number of reasons. Its a very useful tool but is not an accurate complete view of whats going on, its at best a snapshot glimpse.
 
Does anyone know how many MA sells per day?

Hard to say...

We can guess at how many they have sold total tho. Just look at auction history, the majority are initial sales not resales. I think the only day there were any real number of resales was day 1, after that sanity took over and people stopped buying the resale ones. 45xx total sales so far in 3 days. Still a few singles left but most of the bigger lots didn't sell yet today after a couple hours(they ones i saw listed a few hours ago anyway, i could have missed some listed earlier, and i think i did). They listed a lot of singles today compared to other days, as far as i saw.

It does appear that the initial rush is over tho, anyone who wants one can get them now. Most of the initial sales were likely just done with ingame assets.

If they stop selling I'm sure they will just wait a couple months and then list some more. They don't have to sell all 60k at once if they don't want to. Doesn't change the return on 1 share, they just keep the returns on the shares they don't sell until they do sell them.
 
So if this is an opportunity for all players regardless of skills. Why is there a LG? There`s no way low lvl citizens can fight against ubers in a LG. Don`t know if i got this right though, but is this the case ? And don't tell me you mean that there`s always an possibility to grab even at low lvl, dont want to hear that. If this is the case, do you not get the ROI if you don`t manage to get you self a land i LG?

that depends on if there are an equal number of deeds and plots of land. There's plenty of space for them especially if they spread them around. It's where the low lvl's can spoil the ubers day by getting the single plot that prevents them from getting their 3x3 and then selling it to them for a huge markup ;)
 
/small-rant

I feel a lot of people are struggling in a big way with this opportunity.

I for one am, not regarding the nay sayers, but those who really want to get in on this opportunity.

My position is now to wait and get the amount I would like over the next 5 - 6 years, about 500 units

But I have to admit, I do feel a great sense of missing out on something big in the short-term :wise:

However it also could turn into a big relief that I didn't rush in, but my gut is telling me this won't be the case.

The Jan, David & Kim combination is the best i have seen so far;

And they seem to be ontrack with really wanting to make a difference ...

Much different from the Marco days which was mostly BS talk / empty promises at its best.

gl all with this invest/future, and may you all make decisions your happy with.

I know i am not entirely happy with my decision, but I think it is sensible not to buy on loaned money.

This morning I cancelled my line of credit knowing that it would be the end of rushing into buying 500.

An overwhelming sense of missing out is what I am left with now. No relief at this time. Maybe later.

I had to get my feeling down and out on this one to let go of some frustration ... feel free to comment.

/end rant.

This is imho one of the biggest opportunities presented to date in EUs history :wise:

PS. Time to buy a few lottery tickets and hope for the best :D
 
Last edited:
Your not an investment analyst by any chance?

No bud, I have done investment IRL, but nothing virtual.

I am now retired medically and own everything I have, no debts.

I know how bad it is to have debt as I at one point had just over a mil to my name when i lived in CBD sydney.

But enough about that, I lost my sensibility over this one as I feel very confident in the future success of Calypso ...

On the basis some small changes are made - Such as:

A loot diminishing economy to raise loot value to make the game worthwhile playing for all.

More distributed loot system to cater for both younger and older players (Not handing out huge HoFs, just more smaller globals/HoFs)

A good rep to take over the helm - This is already in place, Kim is doing a fantastic job so far - check his postings on EF & follow what he is on about and is all about - Nothing like Marco, 1000% improvement.

And that is about it - All of the above have been hinted towards or are under consideration as far as I know.

I think the miserable time at present (poor loot, low markup loot) on Calypso will change over the next few years if Kim does what he says and puts a bit more effort into looking at creating a sustainable economy that is loot diminishing, primarily craft (L) and balanced by the UnL (Which there is way too much of at present - Some items need to be converted to (L), eg low markup value lvl 100 stuff) in the economy.
 
Last edited:
I'm sure Calypso will be fine. The real world economy, not so much.

Agreed, I am very lucky on that one with Australia being somewhat shield for the next 10 years or so by China buying power of raw materials primarily and a good banking system which has very small exposure to overseas problems.

The rest of the world is in pretty bad shape :( A bit sad really, I do feel for people in their situations.
 
No Man is a Continent

Agreed, I am very lucky on that one with Australia being somewhat shield for the next 10 years or so by China buying power of raw materials primarily and a good banking system which has very small exposure to overseas problems.

The rest of the world is in pretty bad shape :( A bit sad really, I do feel for people in their situations.

Cool. The Aussies will keep the game afloat ;)
 
Hi Kim,

The possibilities - Requirement for larger number of land deeds

Bringing this question in from another thread,
Would this line of thinking be correct "conceptually" in the need for greater number of land deeds ?

Cheers,
Viper

Bumps this question out of curosity, Kim ? *kills the cat in advance*

Any comments are we likely to see other structures / opportunities for greater number of plot/deed allocations ?

Examples:

... Land Lot Deed holders will be able to build house(s) on the plot(s) they have staked out. (Minimum of 9 plots in a 3x3 format suitable for a structure). This system development is scheduled to begin in 2013.

Minimum of 9 (3x3) for the smallest structure - Basic house

I am guessing more for larger structures ...

Examples,

25 (5x5) .. large house,

49 (7x7) ... Mansion,

100 (10x10) ... A very large shop or multiplex of several small shops


250 (25x10) ... Bio farming plot - See B in following link as an example >
https://www.planetcalypsoforum.com/...ents-Realty.&p=1800559&viewfull=1#post1800559

500 (25x20) ... Small LA - See A in following link as an example >
https://www.planetcalypsoforum.com/...ents-Realty.&p=1800559&viewfull=1#post1800559

etc.
 
When I first read the original information about this, my main concern was that the voting system would put too much control in the hands of idiots.

After reading this thread, I am 10 times more worried about that.

I sincerely hope that deedholders won't be allowed to vote on anything of any real significance.
 
Posted on behalf of Jan Welter Timkrans

One of the main reasons for introducing this new system was to finance a substantial marketing campaign for the Entropia Universe. We are committed to initiating a marketing campaign as soon as possibly at much larger scale then we have ever done before.



/EDIT: This was posted in response to questions from Viperstrike voiced yesterday in this thread and through private messages. I thought that the rest of the community would benefit from knowing this as well and that is why I posted the statement in public. - Kim

How about replying to the people quietly asking sensible questions, as well as the guy who doesn't know how to shut up?
 
How about replying to the people quietly asking sensible questions, as well as the guy who doesn't know how to shut up?

Wow someone has a stick stuck up their arse today. But I guess you love conflict lol
50k usd was no small decision to make on moving or not, it almost occured.
People here were here to give me advise that is all Oleg, talking needed to be done.

I have come to my conclusion, so may you may have the stage.

When I first read the original information about this, my main concern was that the voting system would put too much control in the hands of idiots.

After reading this thread, I am 10 times more worried about that.

I sincerely hope that deedholders won't be allowed to vote on anything of any real significance.

And I disagree, if you want to be a part of this, then buy your deed/share and vote accordingly.
 
that depends on if there are an equal number of deeds and plots of land. There's plenty of space for them especially if they spread them around. It's where the low lvl's can spoil the ubers day by getting the single plot that prevents them from getting their 3x3 and then selling it to them for a huge markup ;)

That's the way I understand it as well. There will be 60,000 plots of land and 60,000 land deeds. The land grab will be different in others in a way there will be plenty for everyone. The key is where you get the land. Obviously land around a place like Twin Peaks will be worth more than land in the middle of nowhere. It sounds like the continent will end up being like OLA's but much more condensed. Which makes sense in the evolution of the game......we're "settlers" after all and now it's time to develop the land the way we wish.
 
And I disagree, if you want to be a part of this, then buy your deed/share and vote accordingly.

I have, but sadly my feeble one share will not be enough to outvote the selfish and stupid rich.

So I guess we will see Calypso going the same way the real world has.
 
I have, but sadly my feeble one share will not be enough to outvote the selfish and stupid rich.

So I guess we will see Calypso going the same way the real world has.

We vote on calypso development issues....

Not Mindark, or platform issues.. I imagine our input will go to what kind of event, or content we wish to see them develop first, or maybe a new mob to develop... Not going to have a say in taming or systems like that.
 
2 MOST important questions

Wow i cant believe i managed to read this all .. all 75 pages of it :D

In any case i would like to ask our friends at MA to reply to the most important questions:

1) what generates Planet revenue and how much is it exactly per month (average over last 12 months would be good)?
is it decay(money we spend at the repair terminal)? auction fees? rent (not existent on calypso)? Travel fee for teleport from space to planet? Maybe the 2 ped fee for leaving the atmosphere?

2) will there ever be more than 60 shares dividing the 25% of planet revenue we get? or if I buy 1 i will forever get 1/60,000 of the revenue?

These are the 2 most important things in my opinion.

I already have one share...

If i buy more depends on the answers to these 2 basic questions.


CITIZEN
Ido
 
populous.jpg


Kim, how much to flatten land and drown your neighbours? ;)
 
Lol whats that game I use to play that :cool:
 
Populous

I never knew what a papal magnate was when I played that as a kid. I thought it was pronounced "papaul magnet" and was like a magnet that drew your people (papauls) to it. :laugh:
 
I have, but sadly my feeble one share will not be enough to outvote the selfish and stupid rich.

So I guess we will see Calypso going the same way the real world has.

Agreed :wise:
 
I have, but sadly my feeble one share will not be enough to outvote the selfish and stupid rich.

So I guess we will see Calypso going the same way the real world has.

Mate I don't think it will be that bad, I believe the system will be just and fair.

I will dig up an old post from ... um trying to remember his name ... lol

One of the leaders of the old NBK - Ah!! Hardwrath that is it, he had some brilliant ideas on this
 
Last edited:
Mate I don't think it will be that bad, I believe the system will be just and fair.

I will dig up an old post from ... um trying to remember his name ...

One of the leaders of the old NBK - Ah!! Hardwrath that is it, he had some brilliant ideas on this

Here it is ...

Hardwrath along with myself (as lavawalker) put a lot of hard work into developing this,

It is an OLD IDEA but the CONCEPT still remains relevant ;)

Note: This thread is an evolving and interactive work in progress. As the discussion progresses, this original post is updated with additions, modifications, or clarification. Please read the original post and then jump toward the end of the thread to take part in the current conversation. If you wish to see the entire evolution of this, please feel free to read the whole thread, many people have made a contribution to this and a lot of the below ideas come from the people who have posted in this thread

Marco has subscribed to this thread however due to how busy they are with VU10.0, the bug fixes, and updates, he wants to wait until October to dive into this topic. That gives us plenty of time to work out the details.

----------------------------------------------------------------
In early August, several threads were created regarding an Entropia Government. Let me be very clear about this, the DPAB is NOT a government in any way shape or form.

This proposal has two fundamental parts:
1. Create a place where MA and FPC can bring their ideas to us BEFORE implementing them. First they let us fine tune the concept of whatever new feature or system they want to launch. This will make these new things by far more enjoyable, more usable, and more successful.

2. Ideas, concerns, or whatever that have a lot of support in the EU community could be championed by the DPAB. If MA or FPC arent being receptive to an idea, we would find out why they are against it, and if possible overcome the objection by finding a viable solution. A perfect example would be the in-game rental system idea.


Regarding an Entropia Government:
I want to say that I am 100% totally and completely against anything that governs, or pretends to govern anything in the Entropia Universe. I am especially against anything that puts a tax on EU participants so someone can run around and play Governor with our money.

I don’t need some "Government" telling me how to play EU. Leave me alone, leave my ped alone. Furthermore, I don’t need anyone representing me or my ideas. I am perfectly capable of speaking for myself and conveying my thoughts to others.

‘Nuff said! :smash:

A couple of months ago, this post was made by Marco:

Me, FPC, whatever, liked the alliance as a starting point of a political movement, a step to a more "civilized" community. But I am not sure that the Landgrab event, as intended to be a PvP battle match, is the right venue. From my point of view we however need to introduce other contest into Calypso where politics have a vital role to play and make this into an exciting gameplay element as well. Be it elections, be it that the continents are differentiated into states where avatars can become governors of the states, etc. The potential is there.

Maybe add a state-wide tax that goes to the governors budget? ,-)

Since Marco is the CEO of First Planet Company, if Marco wants a Government, he will probably get it one way or another.

I think that most of the people who are in favor of an EU Government, only favor it because of the fun and interesting dynamics the democratic election process would bring to Calypso. The problem with that election process is the result, which is the elected official(s) running around trying to govern the rest of us while making decisions that please one group of people at the expense or frustration of another group.

There is no doubt that the process of democratic elections would in fact bring a fun and interesting dynamic to EU. The problem is the result of them. If only there was a way to have these democratic elections without having a government or elected officials as the result.

According to polls that have been done about Government in EU only about 10% to 20%% of people want one. Seeing as how only a very small percentage voted in favor of an EU Government, it would be very hard to justify the creation of one. With that said, MindArk almost never really asks our opinion on anything, MindArk does what MindArk wants to do and they hope for the best, which is exactly the fundamental problem that I want to address through the proposed solution below.

When Project Entropia was first created, MindArk had an official forum where they asked for people's thoughts, opinions, and advice on various aspects of the game. When they had an idea they would often times present it to us and get our feedback on it. Eventually, various kinds of nefarious people ruined that forum and MindArk closed it for that and other reasons. From there, the bulk of people started using the Entropia Pioneers forum, which essentially for awhile was the de facto forum for the EU. MindArk, on a limited scale, would seek advice and opinions of EU players but eventually that forum was also destroyed by a bunch of misfits, trolls, and the like who caused excessive moderation to set in. Now we have the Entropia Forum and as years have gone by, MindArk seeks our advice less and less. These days, for better or worse, they mainly just announce things.

In my proposal below, a few things are accomplished
1. Gives us the fun and interesting dynamics of democratic elections without the undesired result of an elected official, government, etc.
2. Gives people a reason to get involved with and be interested in the election process one way or another.
3. Creates a controlled environment where MindArk can involve the EU player base on the developmental processes of the Entropia Universe again.
4. Gives the player base a louder collective voice on topics that need it.

I have a bit of experience creating something similar to what this will develop into. First we need to discuss the framework and rules of it. We need to discuss how it will function and piece it all together accordingly. In October we will here from Marco and hopefully get his input. I would like it very much if Marco took the time to have an open discussion with us about this topic.

Because of how massive this thread is, in October I will probably close this thread and create a new one. That way we can copy and paste what we have put together and then start fresh with Marco.

It is my intent to have an open and constructive debate on all components of this. In the spirit of that, let’s all try to understand the position of the person with an opposite opinion before we post a reply.

Also, please do not feed the trolls, just ignore them.

Below is my proposal, it is an evolving work in progress. As new ideas and opinions are submitted, I edit this post and make changes where needed, recent changes will usually be in a different color.

Development & Planning Advisory Board
DPAB​

The name needs to be descriptive of what the essence of the organization is. Entropia Council sounds cooler but does not represent what it will be. Of course, the word "council" can also be used in a broad way. Will this be called the DPAB? Probably not but for now it works.

Mission Statement:
Together with MA, FPC, and other Planet Partners, we will create and maintain an atmosphere that is conducive to constructive forward thinking dialog while making it possible to involve the EU player base as a whole in the future development of the Entropia Universe.

Description:
The DPAB will be a transparent organization created by the people, with members from among the people, who are chosen by the people of EU. DPAB will serve the dual purpose of maintaining an open dialog with EU officials and Planet Partner officials while also maintaining an open dialog with the player base as a whole.

MindArk and/or the Planet Partners will have to host a single web forum where elected members of the Entropia Universe will participate in the planning and development of the Entropia Universe itself. The EU player base will elect the members and those members will elect their leader. Debates on DPAB operations or policy changes will be settled democratically. In summary, the webform must be "officially owned" but still managed and organized by the EU player base.

The DPAB shall in no way claim, or try to claim to be the Vox Populi (voice of the people) nor shall it claim to be representative thereof. The DPAB is strictly a body of elected EU participants who engage in open and transparent communication with MindArk, First Planet Company, along with any other Planet Partners who are interested in tapping into EU player base to more effectively think of, review, and install new features or components to their virtual world.

Governance
The DPAB will have governance over nothing except for itself. It can never seek to govern, control, or dictate components of game play and it especially cannot interfere with an individual's game play. The DPAB can never serve as a "middle man" between EU Officials and the daily operations or communications of EU participants. The DPAB exists for the sole purpose of creating and maintaining an environment in EU where MA, FPC, and Planet Partners include the EU player base in the development and planning of the Entropia Universe.

The DPAB can never evolve into a governmental body of any kind. If any Planet Partners wishes to implement a Governmental system on their planet, they are highly encouraged to bring the idea(s) to the DPAB for discussion, debate, and idea exchange. If any Planet Company were to install a Governmental body on their Virtual World then it would have to be totally separate from the DPAB. The DPAB will always be nothing more than a group of elected individuals who have real life discussion with MA, FPC, PPs (via a transparent web-forum) regarding the development of the Virtual Worlds in the Entropia Universe.

Checks and Balances
The EU population will elect individuals of their choosing to ensure the following things are being upheld:

- Open communication between the DPAB and the EU population
- No interference with existing or future communication methods between the individual participant and MindArk or Planet Companies
- All DPAB members must follow the published DPAB ethics and rules

Operational policies shall always be subject to review to ensure we are operating in a way that is of benefit to both the player base and also MA, FPC, and Planet Partners

DPAB Size & Member Selection
The size of the DPAB will be large enough to support active and healthy dialog between a spectrum of members that reasonably spans across all facets of EU.

Members of the DPAB will derive from the following sources:

General Election
Every 6 months a general election among the EU player base will be conducted where members are voted into a 6-month term. Those who are elected can serve unlimited consecutive terms, subject to reelection.
- 25 individuals from each planet
- 3 "Watchdogs" from each planet will be elected for the purpose of ensuring members, leaders, and the DPAB itself are all operating in compliance with the expectations of the EU player base. If they spot a problem, their job is to raise the issue with the advisory board, and if a resolution is not reached they are to "blow the whistle" and act accordingly and in a public way if needed. Through right action and open communication, the Watchdogs are in place to ensure the EU population does not lose trust in the DPAB itself.

Appointment
- MindArk, FPC, and other Planet Partners can appoint players from the EU population as needed.
- Each elected DPAB leader can appoint up to 5 people however each must pass a popular vote in the DPAB member body.

Special Election for Temporary Membership
In the interest of ensuring that no good idea or plan is ignored, the EU population as a whole can cause a special election on the DPAB forum. Both DPAB members and the EU population are able to vote for or against it. The result of that election will determine if the individual is able to temporarily join the DPAB for purpose of discussing their specific topic. Generally, non-members of the DPAB will simply just post their ideas in the public section of the DPAB forum.

Leadership Election & Ranks
The leaders of DPAB, known as "Administrators" will serve the purpose of upholding DPAB policy, ethics, and posting standards. He/she will serve as a Forum Moderator/Group Leader (vBulletin terminology) in the DPAB forums. The elected members of each Planet will elect an Administrator.

- Every 6 months the DPAB members of each Planet will elect a new person from among its members to the position of Administrator. No one can serve consecutive 6-month terms, however an individual can serve multiple terms with at least a 6-month gap in between each.
- Former Administrators will (after their term) remain as a "Leader Advisor" to the new elected Administrator of that planet.
- The Administrator can nominate people into special positions such as "spokesperson" from among the DPAB members. Any nomination must be confirmed or denied by the DPAB through popular vote.
- From among the watchdogs elected, 1 person per planet will be chosen by the watchdogs who will also serve as forum moderator for the purpose of being able to see any deleted or edited threads and posts from within the DPAB

Operational Structure
The DPAB will initially go through a 6-month trial period where all facets of operations will be reviewed. The DPAB will have to operate on a dedicated site owned by MindArk that includes a forum with vBulletin technology to maintain uniformity with other popular EU related fan sites such as www.EntropiaForum.com and to ensure all modern forum technology and functionality is available.

Within the DPAB forum, there will be two sections.
1. Open section for any EU participant to post in and interact with DPAB members or even EU officials.
2. Restricted section that is visible to all EU participants but only DPAB members and EU officials can post.

Each involved Planet Partner, along with MindArk will have their own subforum within both sections of the DPAB forum. An example of the sub-forum breakdown is as follows:

Member's Section
- MindArk
- First Planet Company
- ABC Planet Partner
- XYX Planet Partner
- General Discussion
- DPAB Operations
- Off Topic

Public Section
- News
- MindArk
- First Planet Company
- ABC Planet Partner
- XYX Planet Partner
- General Discussion
- DPAB Operations
- Off Topic

It is the prerogative of MindArk, along with Planet Partners to be involved with the moderation responsibilities of the DPAB or not. Generally, it would be preferred that forum moderation be left to DPAB elected Administrators and for those Administrators to be held accountable if responsible moderation is not maintained. If a mature and constructive environment is not maintained, an Administrator can lose that privilege, in which case a new Administrator would have to be elected.

**An important objective will be to include the in-game Voting Booths to conduct DPAB elections of all kinds.

DPAB Ethics & Rules
In order for a member or leader to maintain their membership and status in the DPAB, they must adhere to the following:
1. Do not ever steal, scam, or exploit
2. Never gain any special form of compensation, income, benefit, or opportunity from any player or any special interest group related to the Entropia Universe because of your elected position in the DPAB.
3. Always be respectful to other DPAB members
4. Personal disputes aside, always be respectful to other EU participants, especially while they are interacting with the DPAB in any capacity


Vote Of Distrust
If for any reason a DPAB member, or even its leader, is acting in a way that is not consistent with the rules, ethics, or public trust, then a "vote of distrust" could be initiated by either another DPAB member, or the EU community itself. Through a vote of distrust, a person would lose their place in the DPAB.

It shall be known to all individuals who seek or accept a position within the DPAB, they will be entering into the “public eye” and as a result their actions and conduct will be scrutinized and can be judged by the EU population.

**MindArk and Planet Partners reserve the right to remove a Member, Administrator, or anyone else from the DPAB at any time, with or without reason.

Posting Procedures
If a member wants to raise an issue then they can raise it simply by making a thread. If other members are interested they can post their opinion, or their thoughts on the subject and a discussion would naturally start. If MA, FPC, or Planet Partner employees want to weigh in on the subject, naturally they would.

If there is a member of the EU population who is not on the advisory board who wants the board to review something, all they would have to do is convince any 1 member of the board to take up the issue.

MindArk, First Planet Company, and Planet Partners are strongly encouraged to present ideas as "what if" scenarios to the DPAB member body for discussion.

Operational Modifications
The DPAB is a self governing body. In the event a member would like to see a new feature of the DPAB, or remove an old feature, a vote by DPAB members would be held and would to determine if such a change would be enacted. Some things would naturally require MA, FPC, or PP approval.
---------------------------------------------------------------
Assuming that this will be implemented, the following are the steps to get there.

1. Develop detailed framework, structure, rules, and operational policy
2. Obtain the support of the player base & MA/FPC

Once those big steps are done then we can move into the process of actually creating it, which brings up a big question.

That is, what would my involvement be at that point? Would HardWrath be the leader?

The answer is that I would have to enter the DPAB just like anyone else. Once elected to the DPAB by the community, if I were to seek an Administrator role I would have to obtain it the same way as anyone else which would be to get elected as Administrator by the DPAB members.

After not originally wanting to seek a leadership role in the DPAB, if I am elected into the DPAB, it is now my intention to seek an Administrator role for the purpose of making sure things get off to a good start. Like anyone else, I would not be able to serve as an Administrator for more than 6 months.

---------------------------------------------------------------
 
Last edited:
Hello,

Anyone can tell how much peds will give 1 deed by week/year ?

How can you calculate that ?
 
Back
Top