Gewitter
Elite
- Joined
- Sep 10, 2012
- Posts
- 2,805
- Location
- Moscow - Russia
- Society
- Deep Core Mining
- Avatar Name
- Andrey Andy Russian
Stfu already.
I think you need to be done this, because you do not have a minimum rudiments of culture
Stfu already.
Nah, i used or consumed resources and materials i looted until now, producing items, tools and other for own use.
And i was happy to not have to pay MU to anyone because that could mean my game play cost go up.
TT game is what MA offer.
TT (MA) dont pay MU.
If anyone think that one item/resource on auction have too low bidout he can PM seller and offer him more and sponsorise that seller or reseller gameplay.
Any attempt to inflate prices mean someone will have to pay that inflated MU and that mean gameplay cost increase.
What we really should do at the moment is get of the boards and start logging loot, just like OP did. It will be easier to have a sensible discussion once we gathered some data.
In that case I understand your point of view. If this new loot system works out as it is intended to, it should end up being beneficial to you.
What we really should do at the moment is get of the boards and start logging loot, just like OP did. It will be easier to have a sensible discussion once we gathered some data.
Yet another idea that simplifies 'utopia'. Would be enough to make Mod FAP maxed at 100-150 lvl paramedic, and it will be huge non-eco on low levels like 20-50, and good idea to remove all UL SIB Weapon, and UL uber armor. Only 100 level maxed Weapon or Limited. Only limited armor. The game was killed with a huge quantity of UL SIB-weapons. Why you need to skilling to 100 lvl? Its enough to buy Calytrek TEN on 40 and voila! SIB weapon UL is wrong decision of Game Devs. This decision do not bring nothing to economy. A noob can loot Zero-Three from Beryc! It is wrong.
Thus for the production and looting armor, weapons, you will need all that we get in the loot and too many people to produce something like weapon and armor. And all osseo will be in use by hunters, and on all loot will be demand.
And would not need any changes in the loot that we see now. All items may have demand. Now too many people are not consumers of markup, but generators. Me too. But i'm not a 100 lvl, only 60+.
I like this picture. But this is not an accurate comparison. Nice try. Try again
I like this picture. But this is not an accurate comparison. Nice try. Try again
Well you are alone in your "crusade", so quite accurate comparison.
I'm not alone, recieved too many +rep today for my ideas
There are many thoughtful people who agree with me in most aspects. Among them even Kim, but he can not make decisions, because these decisions may impact to corporate finances or reputation. But I'm not Kim and I can say what I thinking. Again - this is a forum where I can freely express my opinion.
The game was killed with a huge quantity of UL SIB-weapons. Why you need to skilling to 100 lvl? Its enough to buy Calytrek TEN on 40 and voila! SIB weapon UL is wrong decision of Game Devs. This decision do not bring nothing to economy. A noob can loot Zero-Three from Beryc! It is wrong.
Could you please quote the part where Kim agrees with you!
Its enough for me. Dont know how enough for youIts true that some items such as the mod fap should never have been introduced in the first place
I'm not alone, recieved too many +rep today for my ideas
There are many thoughtful people who agree with me in most aspects.
This:
Its enough for me. Dont know how enough for you
I'm not alone, recieved too many +rep today for my ideas
There are many thoughtful people who agree with me in most aspects. Among them even Kim, but he can not make decisions, because these decisions may impact to corporate finances or reputation. But I'm not Kim and I can say what I thinking. Again - this is a forum where I can freely express my opinion.
There's just no way that could ever happen. Its true that some items such as the mod fap should never have been introduced in the first place but now that they are here we cant alter them in such a way as it would completely erode the confidence players have for investing in their avatar, plus the fact that its a fundamentally flawed approach. What we can do to limit the effect of such items on the economy as a whole is to do things like item upgrade quests where two items can make one better etc, but on a completely voluntary basis.
This:
Its enough for me. Dont know how enough for you
Dear Skeptic, Kim can not saying something other (due to reputation and financial risks), but he said that these items is a mistake, and they Dev Team trying somehow to fix it
Dear Skeptic, Kim can not saying something other (due to reputation and financial risks), but he said that these items is a mistake, and they Dev Team trying somehow to fix it
This:
Its enough for me. Dont know how enough for you
Sceptic,
It's essentially not a matter, because my ideas will be not executed, it is you want to hear?
However, one turn after turn, and helix narrows. For 'investors' will be a terrible shock to reach the summit, although it will not be met now and not even a year-two later. Play safe, and do not depo more, than you can lose for fun!
getting close to slander....
Sceptic,
It's essentially not a matter, because my ideas will be not executed, it is you want to hear?
However, one turn after turn, and helix narrows. For 'investors' will be a terrible shock to reach the summit, although it will not be met now and not even a year-two later. Play safe, and do not depo more, than you can lose for fun!
Only two names for sceptics to end debate:
Sergei Mavrodi
Bernard Madoff
I do not for not implying anything, but nevertheless
Stfu already.
Nope, but you can read how many people 'invested' into virtual projects. Virtual project cant guarantee your investments, because don't own a real actives (read EULA carefully, you can return from your Mod FAP only 16$, not MU if game will be closed or many other factors (maybe I loot a 100500 of them )). You can only hope that the game will be live in a decades (I hope too, because I like this game). But judging by your response, you have invested in it so much that inside you lives fear of losing everything. I'm not afraid, although my depos calculated in tens of thousands of dollars. That is the difference. I play for fun. And that's why we see so many complaints from 'investors' when their assets are impaired due to changes in the game.Comparing Mindark with a ponzi?
Nope, but you can read how many people 'invested' into virtual projects. Virtual project cant guarantee your investments, because don't own a real actives (read EULA carefully, you can return from your Mod FAP only 16$, not MU if game will be closed). You can only hope that the game will be live in a decades (I hope too, because I like this game). But judging by your response, you have invested in it so much that inside you lives fear of losing everything. I'm not afraid, although my depos calculated in tens of thousands of dollars. That is the difference. I play for fun. And that's why we see so many complaints from 'investors' when their assets are impaired due to changes in the game.
Therefore, I propose changes that would be good for me and many-many others, but not for 'investors' who, if changes will be accepted, will lose everything in one moment.
Then I do not understand you, what do you care for Mod FAP?
And I do not think about my deposits as investments, and just see them as a fee for fun.