Question: Efficiency of [Fire Forge DAR 9300, Modified] and [Omegaton A204, Hypercharged]?

NevadaJake

Stalker
Joined
Nov 14, 2007
Posts
1,908
Avatar Name
Drake Slade Corbett
Anyone know what efficiency you can get with [Fire Forge DAR 9300, Modified] and [Omegaton A204, Hypercharged]?
 

TumiTimeless

Provider
Joined
Dec 20, 2015
Posts
120
Avatar Name
Tumi Tumi Timeless
Per 711, wiki is running now. I haven't tried wep compare yet
 

NevadaJake

Stalker
Joined
Nov 14, 2007
Posts
1,908
Avatar Name
Drake Slade Corbett
Weapon Compare is working. How do we view the combined Efficiency?

QGuEXD4.png
 

Orion

Old Alpha
Joined
Apr 19, 2005
Posts
762
Location
Germany
Society
Crimson Devils
Avatar Name
Eleria 'Orion' Starwind
How do we view the combined Efficiency?

You can't.
You have to do the math by yourself.
WeaponCompare 2.0 was created by clever Wiki coders who quit before EFF got introduced.

A good reason for you and you and YOU to register an account and help improving Wiki with your coding talents! :computer:
 

kingofaces

Old Alpha
Joined
Jun 10, 2013
Posts
885
Location
US
Avatar Name
Tony KingofAces Hans
I don’t have the exact formula handy tonight, but all you need is just the total decay + ammo for both the weapon and amp. Instead of just taking the average efficiency between the weapon and amp, you need to weight it according to how much each contributes to the total cost per shot.

The amp is only 16% of the cost per shot, so that weighted average of efficiency should come out to 62.5%, but I’d want to double check my verified formulas on my spreadsheet when I get home tomorrow before quoting me on that.
 

kingofaces

Old Alpha
Joined
Jun 10, 2013
Posts
885
Location
US
Avatar Name
Tony KingofAces Hans
Found a stray spreadsheet that had the calcs in it.

In Excel, the formula is: =ROUNDUP((W/(A+W))*E+(A/(A+W))*P,1)

W = Weapon cost (ammo + decay)
A = Amp cost (ammo + decay)
E = Weapon eff.
P = Amp eff.

That brings it to 62.6% If I recall correctly, rounding up matches what is shown in the weapon's item page with an amp attached, but the game may still use more digits before rounding we cannot see. Still, that'll get you within a 0.1% if it's actually supposed to be normal rounding rather than always rounding up.

Edit: For clarity, the numbers for this item set are W=37, A=7.055, E=59.4, P=78.9 taken directly from the wiki. Make sure they costs are in pec.
 
Last edited:

unufain8

Old Alpha
Joined
Jun 24, 2012
Posts
730
Location
Somewhere between here and there.
Society
Dark Side
Avatar Name
-Saphire of Dark-
Or you could just ask Buck Stone and thats it.
 

Kerham

Elite
Joined
Sep 6, 2006
Posts
4,858
Location
to the moon and back
Society
Project Y
Avatar Name
Kerawan Kerham Maddahy
be it item A,B

effAB= ((costA*effA)+(costB*effB))/(costA+costB), where "cost" is in the sense used in wiki, decay+ammo per click

notes:

1. eff of nonmaxed weapons need to be adjusted for impact of HA under 10 (re impact of "missed" in turnover)
2. overamping gives "fake" eff increase, is only displayed
3. not sure alltogether on eff of nonmaxed weapons, MA's statements are contradictory.
 

RobBuona

Elite
Joined
Dec 29, 2010
Posts
2,502
Location
North Carolina
Society
Stockholm Syndrome
Avatar Name
Patrizia Pandemic Giano
Found a stray spreadsheet that had the calcs in it.
Is this posted somewhere? I am trying to run this in Excel and not having much luck.
 

kingofaces

Old Alpha
Joined
Jun 10, 2013
Posts
885
Location
US
Avatar Name
Tony KingofAces Hans
Is this posted somewhere? I am trying to run this in Excel and not having much luck.
I don’t have the spreadsheet posted anywhere, but make sure you are using values as they show in the wiki having costs in pec. Here’s what this item set would be.

=Roundup((37/(7.055+37))*59.4+(7.055/(7.055+37))*78.9,1)
 
Last edited:

Ferial

Guardian
Joined
Jul 4, 2012
Posts
329
Location
Sweden
Avatar Name
Chris Ferial Book
Is this posted somewhere? I am trying to run this in Excel and not having much luck.

Threw this together in a couple of minutes for you and as such, it is not very pretty, but it appears to be working :D :

DISCLAIMER: This is based purely on the formulas provided within this thread and only tested on one setup. YMMV
 

ermik

Elite
Joined
Dec 4, 2006
Posts
4,911
Location
oil rig
Society
The Unit
Avatar Name
ermik ermik ermik
Yup, 62,5 is the eff with a204 hyper.
 

Tilli

Provider
Joined
Apr 25, 2014
Posts
133
Avatar Name
garnet til alexandros
Why would anyone invest 10-20k ped on a204 when you can get delta for 200 ped and slab it on it :p You can cycle 24631 ped with mod dar per 1 delta, so 1k ped MU spend per 100k ped cycled, thats around 1%.
 

Katie Chalmers

Guardian
Joined
Oct 13, 2020
Posts
284
Location
Australia
Avatar Name
Katie Chalmers
Why would anyone invest 10-20k ped on a204 when you can get delta for 200 ped and slab it on it :p You can cycle 24631 ped with mod dar per 1 delta, so 1k ped MU spend per 100k ped cycled, thats around 1%.
MU on them is pretty hefty, adds 1% in MU to your burn. Guess that's not acceptable to many players.
 

Hijacker27

Marauder
Joined
May 14, 2007
Posts
5,132
Location
Mississauaga Ontario, Canada
Society
Crimson Devils
Avatar Name
hijacker Hijacker27 inferno
Is this posted somewhere? I am trying to run this in Excel and not having much luck.
 
Top