If that's the case why doesnt the new scientist article that was released AFTER say the same? But instead say the general consessus is that noone really knows for sure what it is yet?
Don't believe every news story out there, we all know they lie to get hood drifts.
If it was the status, that story would be everywhere, but its not.
I don't understand those of you anywhere who are hell bent on trying to bury this thing prematurely just incase it changes physics as we know it.
There's a Shit load more we don't know about the universe, we acctually know pretty little. So just because something isn't possible based upon what we know doesn't by any streach of the definition make it impossible.
Just means its either an error or our knowledge of the universe is incomplete. And to find out what ones what the only way to find out is to look into it with an open mind, rather than letting what you want to see make you see something wrongly as fact.
As I said, if that article you refer to was fact the story would be everywhere, and its not, so clearly for now the case isn't closed and that probably isn't any more than a theroy from someone who is letting what they want to be true cloud their judgement.
When a conclusion is found that is widely seen as fact, it will be reported on everywhere in the science news world and perhaps beyond that too. Until that happens noone clearly knows for sure what the hell it was.
Last edited:
