I love how much discrepancy there is in here. I am not sure where the lot of you get most of what you say in the first place. Constantly creating an avenue for everyone to be on the wrong side from the right answer. Besides the point...
CLDs make up 50% of Planet Calypsos PP Revenue, the Treasure Island Deeds are going to make up 50% of PP Revenue for Treasure Island.
If MA had the power to do "Whatever the want" so to say, I am sure they would have millions of dollars of CLDs from players who have moved on from the game and never cashed out. Also, The reclamation that Treasure Island is now owned by MA and now Deathifier as no one knows anything about any of that except MA and "maybe" Deathifier. Taxes are being turned off, and revenue is coming from PP Revenue. As far as I know, Planet Calypso was developed by the owners of MA so that would mean that CLDs are theirs to change, but why would they do that when there is no necessity to do that?"
If I remember right, Crystal Palace didn't show people what the taxes were, kind of like a Planet with PP Revenue coming from loot, I am probably wrong about that, but it was announced that the sale of shares was implemented by the player who owned it, that the money from share sales was going to that player, and that the player was selling the crystal palace station to the players. They didn't do that this time and I realize we are in the dark in regard to player insurance or assurance. It seems a lot is being insinuated that 50%+50% equals more than 100%, but it isn't even 1/10th of the planet and even after the update probably isn't anywhere close to 1/10th of CLD revenue... MA/Calypso can't give to the community by eliminating 100% of revenue to themselves with New Treasure Island although the revenue from revenue deeds from players who have moved on goes into their pockets? I mean, seems like a way out of a lawsuit to me. I don't know how it works in peoples minds everywhere else in the world isn't necessarily a concept of educational foundation to misinterpret the concept of others opinions although the ability cannot be removed.
The number CLDs make up 7.5% of the total number of New Treasure Island Deeds. Look at the cost of CLDs right now and the 10ped cost of Treasure Island Deeds. That would be close to an equivalence of 130ped of Treasure island deeds to get the same percentage of deeds as the one of CLDs.
So, on the assumption that MA can do whatever they want, let's assume that it is based on a norm of which decreases every year. The norm being average/current not the deacrease. How much revenue do you think Treasure Island deeds are producing when it takes 13 New Treasure Island deeds would be needed to average out 1 CLD, but it is actually 30 New Treasure Island Deeds, to be paying the same amount for 1 CLD. Note, CLDs originally sold for 1150 ped and payouts have gone down every year... So, back then 1cld cost is equivelant to the now 11.5 New Treasure Island Deed Costs.
Just how much do you think the New Treasure Island Deeds will pull in revenue? It is rather unknown.
I want to continue and hangout, I just saw a lot of weird confusion going around in a manner that is not uncommon to create a system that makes everyone insecure and wanted to join along in the party for a moments time and slightly clean up some of the incentivized collusion.
I believe there was more I wanted to comment on, but I am more interested in being progressive tha