Moonbiter
Elite
- Joined
- Apr 10, 2006
- Posts
- 2,740
- Location
- Vilnius, Lithuania
- Society
- Ex Cons
- Avatar Name
- Luke Moonbiter Sinclair
Well, first of all i want to state my intention of posting this thread. I'm not whining, and it's nothing personal against ATH'ers themselves (i don't even know them ingame), but it's to get a view from other miners on this matter, especially active ones.
Ok, so let's begin.
1) 2008-06-10, 76k Lyst on cnd unamped by TCS Matty AA. Fairly unknown miner, or to be exact nobody has heard about him before his ATH. Even to this day, ET has only 7 mining globals (including his ath) registered from him, since april 28th and to this day.
2) 2008-07-02, 40k Narc on cnd + 10k tower the day before by The Gypsy Princess. Avatar younger than 1.5 years (some attributes readed @1 when i scanned her), intelligence 44 (good indication to judge about overall activity in mining). At the time of hiting those, wasn't on ET's miner top100 if i'm not mistaken. Too bad ET doesn't allow to check further back in history atm, so can only rely on my memory.
3) 2008-06-23, 120k Zinc by Sponzorusa Svaba Qrava. z20+oa103 from what i know. Avatar has similar (read low) experience in mining as gypsy, intelligence being at 45. For this case i remember for sure, she wasn't on ET's miners top100, and had a few globals before hiting ath.
[4th example removed due to being inaccurate, seems this one really went to dedicated miner.]
Ok, so these are the latest cases from what i could remember during the last few months. I think all of them show that big finds (or should i say super big, 3 of them are in all time high top7) go to inexperienced and/or inactive miners. Now again, there's nothing personal against those ATH'ers, gratz to them on their big finds. But i question the system, which generates such finds, is it logical? Shouln't efforts and big turnovers be rewareded, instead of noobiness? If MA really gets their profit from decay, so how come the biggest earners aren't rewarded? Of course i understand that new avatars should get lucky, no one questions that, but when 90% of the big finds go to new players, there's definetely something wrong.
So, what do you think about all this?
Ok, so let's begin.
1) 2008-06-10, 76k Lyst on cnd unamped by TCS Matty AA. Fairly unknown miner, or to be exact nobody has heard about him before his ATH. Even to this day, ET has only 7 mining globals (including his ath) registered from him, since april 28th and to this day.
2) 2008-07-02, 40k Narc on cnd + 10k tower the day before by The Gypsy Princess. Avatar younger than 1.5 years (some attributes readed @1 when i scanned her), intelligence 44 (good indication to judge about overall activity in mining). At the time of hiting those, wasn't on ET's miner top100 if i'm not mistaken. Too bad ET doesn't allow to check further back in history atm, so can only rely on my memory.
3) 2008-06-23, 120k Zinc by Sponzorusa Svaba Qrava. z20+oa103 from what i know. Avatar has similar (read low) experience in mining as gypsy, intelligence being at 45. For this case i remember for sure, she wasn't on ET's miners top100, and had a few globals before hiting ath.
[4th example removed due to being inaccurate, seems this one really went to dedicated miner.]
Ok, so these are the latest cases from what i could remember during the last few months. I think all of them show that big finds (or should i say super big, 3 of them are in all time high top7) go to inexperienced and/or inactive miners. Now again, there's nothing personal against those ATH'ers, gratz to them on their big finds. But i question the system, which generates such finds, is it logical? Shouln't efforts and big turnovers be rewareded, instead of noobiness? If MA really gets their profit from decay, so how come the biggest earners aren't rewarded? Of course i understand that new avatars should get lucky, no one questions that, but when 90% of the big finds go to new players, there's definetely something wrong.
So, what do you think about all this?
Last edited: