Are you as stupid as your post suggests?
That was rhetorical. The fact you belittle anyone who disagrees with your overtly complex way of looking at a simple situation, would suggest you are.
It's black and white.
You agreed to be robbed if someone has the ability to do so, so why complain when you're robbed? It was your choice and trying to apply real world bs to this, is just that... bs. The game allows lootable PVP, if you think real world law applies then take MA to court or stfu and deal with it.
The choice is simple. Deal with the consequence of that decision or QQ more.
Again, I did NOT complain that I was robbed. I didn't express my personal POV at all , in fact, but your replies condsistently put words in my mouth by negating things that I never said.
If all you want to do is spout rhetoric with no reference at all to what I'm saying , then you shouldn't begin by quoting me, should you? That's downright misleading.
Btw, since you regognise "Are you as stupid as your post suggests? " as a purely rhetorical question, in what sense is it belittling? Don't answer that. That's another rhetorical question, for you* On the other hand, I think "DEAL WITH IT" , as an answer to my point, or any other, comes across as highly belittling, so i would make no apology for responding in like fashion. even if I had.
Re, your previous post: if you don't want to engage in a moral argument, then quite simply, don't.
It was your choice and trying to apply real world bs to this, is just that... bs.
That is a moral argument, You are taking a moral stance on this issue (or you might prefer to call it an amoral stance, but you know what I mean). And, really, if you really don't intend to personally offend people by that kind of statement, then you;d better cosider saying "People" (or similar) not "you", and avoid beginning with a quote. Otherwise, of course it will appear like a personal attack.
jay
PS. will resist reponding to any further posts of yours, because I'm beginning to suspect you're just trolling, and it's becoming increasingly pointless in any case.
* belated clarification: In my case, the implicit answer to the rhetorical question was "No, you can't really be that stupid..." ofc, which is why it isn't belittling (though you could surely take offense on some other ground if you really wanted to) THat prolly really doesn't need explaining, but I've stayed up too late and I'm tired enough to think that maybe it does.