the title says i all....win, lose, or nothing different.....thaniks for the neg rep...LOL
Seoul
I don't know if you ment something else, but to me it looks as if your
poll has 5 option with the game ending and one impossible but positive option.
You should have done a poll with equal amount of negative and positive
option, and maybe also a neutral option.
And you did obviously not understand this part either:
No need for a -rep thou' due to that.
I
didn't -rep you for the poll, since I think a negative rep should be used
for worse things than that.
I didn't +rep you either thou'.
Now back to topic, will EU be around in a year? Yes, if they manage to
keep and increase the amount of users.
They
must increase their income from the users, but that can only be
done if enough of the users are satisfied with the experience they get
from EU.
There is obviously something wrong when they are forced to do deals
outside of EU, which must to be completed, otherwise there might be
problems to even have the "MA-group" running.
They (MA) have atm three projects/deals, that are importent for them.
One of these three projects seem to be more or less completed, so no need to panic.
Imo, a healthy company must be able to run with income from the daily
use of the service they provide. They might not be able to progress
as a company thou'.
The annual report might be interpreted in serveral ways, I saw both
good and bad parts in it. Odd that not more people reacted on some
parts in it thou'...
Imo, EU has a way too high percentage of "investors", and a too low percentage
of users that see EU as entertainment (not the part who mostly look
at the fun to play for eco, but the part who only use the service as
as a game) .