Hi Miles,
seems you got me wrong. Maybe I should have explained better.
I'll try now:
So is your position that because bugs were exploited in the past, bugs should be exploitable now and forever?
Not at all.
But my position is that organizing lynch mobs against helpless newbies on the one side, but closing eyes and ears against exploits utilized by better known participants on the other side, is bigoted, hypocritical and abominable.
Lynching those that stole some crumbs while itself socializing with the local mafia boss was always the way of choice for a certain type of people - it's just ways less dangerous, and more rewarding
Yes, it is up to MA to act as judge, jury, and possibly executioner for those abusing this or any exploit
Yes. This is MA's job,
and only MA's.
as well as those who see fit to oppose them vigilante fashion.
No!
There is a reason vigilante justice is strictly forbidden in all civilized countries in the RL. It has always been used to terrorize disliked outcasts, and very often just by those that had the most skeletons in their closet ...
Answering an offense with another offense isn't a solution, it just doubles the number of offenses.
Any civilized country leaves the legislative, jurisdiction and executive to special, well controlled entities, not to the mob. With a reason.
Intentionally exploiting bugs is cheating, period. It is now, it was then, and unless MA changes the EULA, it will continue to be so. MA should punish those who do it.
Fully agree! MA should investigate, judge and take proper action.
Those who chose to take justice into their own hands also risk running afoul of the EULA, and should suffer the consequences if they do.
Fully agree!
In my opinion they have run afoul yet. I have quoted the paragraph of the TOA that is see fit to.
The vigilantes have denied MA the ability to investigate, judge and take proper action, proclaiming they'd be better in this.
They have acted "harassing or threatening to another person" not only in game but in this forum, too.
Rationalizing away the cheating now because of cheating in the past is fallacious and amoral.
I did not. See above. Cheating is cheating, and should be sanctioned. Period!
But it should be sanctioned by those, and only by those, that are the only ones able and entitled to define "cheating" - MA!
See the dreaded "crafting helpers". It's very easy to declare these as bannable offense, as cheating, because they clearly violate the written words of the EULA and/ or TOA - if this isn't use of 3rd party tools, what else?
MA chooses not to act against, and not to give proper statements, too. (where's our shiny crusaders "crafting terminal patrol", btw? maybe auto-crafting, if they're not harassing newbies?)
MA has chosen not to act against this yet, but to keep the possibility open to act whenever they see fit.
And as as long as they don't do, it's not cheating!
It's MA that defines "cheating", not us!
And it's MA that is to stop it if they see fit, not us!
MA has chosen to stop participants happy to pull trains of mobs onto other participants yet. And MA might not be this happy to be told by some "We know better, and can do your job better!" with their actions.
At least I hope! Because in my humble opinion this game needs anything but self proclaimed vigilantes terrorizing anybody that is not suiting their flavor. Today it's border sweaters, who is it tomorrow?
Have fun!